He was correct in the first case from what I recall. Even now there is confusion about what is really happening. When in doubt he is your best bet.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 2:47 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship How about his attempts to jiggle his equations to come up with a static universe? The cosmological constant. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:38 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: He had to make certain assumptions to formulate his theories. His track record has been great thus far and I am not aware of cases that do not fall into line. Actually, the assumption that all motion is relative makes a great deal of sense. Unless this is proven in error I plan to continue relying upon it. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 2:24 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:02 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: All observers must see a world that is consistent with the laws of physics. A constant speed of light is an absolute assumption by Einstein. What if this assumption is not true all the time.
