If a magnetic field can escape a black hole, does it mean that the magnetic field can go faster than light?.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:10 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting situation. I doubt that magnetic fields can escape a black > hole unless they are static and locked into place. I believe this because > electromagnetic energy is not supposed to be able to escape the hole. A > magnetic field takes time to change value and that can be broken into a > spectrum of frequencies. Any AC signals are suppressed, so there should be > no time domain changes to the fields entering the black hole horizon. > > To me this is analogous to the way a super conductor of certain types > keep out magnetic fields. > > This is my opinion of course. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 3:01 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131113132200.htm > Astronomers Reveal Contents of Mysterious Black Hole Jets > What would it mean if the magnetic field lines produced by the > accusation disk can travel straight through the black hole and emerge at > its poles to accelerate matter from the poles of the black hole? > Magnetism cannot be stopped by gravity. Magnetism can grow very strong > and escape a black hole when light cannot. > > > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:51 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> He was correct in the first case from what I recall. Even now there is >> confusion about what is really happening. When in doubt he is your best >> bet. >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 2:47 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship >> >> How about his attempts to jiggle his equations to come up with a static >> universe? The cosmological constant. >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:38 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> He had to make certain assumptions to formulate his theories. His track >>> record has been great thus far and I am not aware of cases that do not fall >>> into line. >>> >>> Actually, the assumption that all motion is relative makes a great >>> deal of sense. Unless this is proven in error I plan to continue relying >>> upon it. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 2:24 am >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:02 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> All observers must see a world that is consistent with the laws of >>>> physics. >>>> >>> >>> A constant speed of light is an absolute assumption by Einstein. What if >>> this assumption is not true all the time. >>> >> >> >
