It must first be established that it can escape the hole. My suspicion is that this would not happen unless the field was in existence before the event horizon formed. There is no reason that I am aware of to suspect that magnetic fields change any faster than normal light through space.
You realize that fields should be generated in the regions outside of the horizon. This is where most of the action would be originating. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 3:16 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship If a magnetic field can escape a black hole, does it mean that the magnetic field can go faster than light?. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:10 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: Interesting situation. I doubt that magnetic fields can escape a black hole unless they are static and locked into place. I believe this because electromagnetic energy is not supposed to be able to escape the hole. A magnetic field takes time to change value and that can be broken into a spectrum of frequencies. Any AC signals are suppressed, so there should be no time domain changes to the fields entering the black hole horizon. To me this is analogous to the way a super conductor of certain types keep out magnetic fields. This is my opinion of course. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 3:01 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/11/131113132200.htm AstronomersReveal Contents of Mysterious Black Hole Jets What wouldit mean if the magnetic field lines produced by the accusation disk can travel straightthrough the black hole and emerge at its poles to accelerate matter from thepoles of the black hole? Magnetism cannotbe stopped by gravity. Magnetism can grow very strong and escape a black holewhen light cannot. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:51 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: He was correct in the first case from what I recall. Even now there is confusion about what is really happening. When in doubt he is your best bet. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 2:47 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship How about his attempts to jiggle his equations to come up with a static universe? The cosmological constant. On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:38 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: He had to make certain assumptions to formulate his theories. His track record has been great thus far and I am not aware of cases that do not fall into line. Actually, the assumption that all motion is relative makes a great deal of sense. Unless this is proven in error I plan to continue relying upon it. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 2:24 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Local Calculated Velocity of Space Ship On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 2:02 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: All observers must see a world that is consistent with the laws of physics. A constant speed of light is an absolute assumption by Einstein. What if this assumption is not true all the time.
