-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Lowe 

The report is in Swedish, here is Google Translation link:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsuper
sync.com%2Felforsk.pdf


There are a few historical gems in here, or referenced in other documents -
which go back half a century, and are worthy of re-assessment.

For instance, Borghi's "synthetic" neutron was almost certainly f/H or
fractional hydrogen (Mills' hydrino). Here is the timeline. 

1940 Seemingly unaware of Harkins's work, Don Carlo Borghi makes the
assumption again that the neutron is a peculiar "bound state" of the
hydrogen atom. His hypothesis is refused because it "contradicts Bohr's atom
and Heisenberg's Quantum Mechanics". Borghi does not realize the "danger" of
his hypothesis. He insists and is estranged.

1950-1955  D. C. Borghi experiments to synthesize "neutrons" starting from a
cold hydrogen plasma. Expelled from Milan, he moves to the Vatican. With the
money he is given, he starts his experiments in a Roman laboratory. Borghi
succeeds where Harkins failed: "cold" synthesis of the neutron shows that
the neutron really is "the sum of the proton and an electron" [according to
the flawed interpretation of the experiment].

1958    Borghi tries to present his experimental results at the Vienna
Convention. But
Amaldi's action prevents him from having his paper accepted. Estranged once
again, Borghi leaves the scene for good.

In conclusion, a good case can be made for the proposition that 35 years
before Mills, Borghi did indeed discover a neutral particle, which was
slightly lower mass than a neutron, and slightly heavier than a proton, and
which he had manufactured in a cold hydrogen plasma. The identity of this
particle is now referred to as f/H or fractional hydrogen (Mills' hydrino).

AFAIK - Borghi's paper remains unpublished to this day. It would interesting
to see his proof.






Reply via email to