The report is not so deep... just a listing, with few judgement and data. quick job.
About the prediction that even good report will be ignored and destroyed by a BS article, It is a sad prediction, but realistic. it remind me the e-cat Elforsk test... see how the skeptics swallowed like honey the toilet paper of Pomp&Eriksson.. this BS paper is exactly what the skeptics like MY hateamong true-believers... something worst the the usual conspiracy theory article, the true believer free energy fan... See how Wikipravda and the skeptics sallow it but forget carefully the interview of Bo Hoistad which explain how anti-scientific, uninformed, incompetent, shameful is that pamphlet... there is no limit to what the deniers can swallow to continue believing "skeptopaths are true believers of status quo" said Geritt on ECW 2013/11/27 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm from Sweden and have read the report. Its bad written and extremely >> messy and confusing. >> > Thanks for confirming that. The problem is not the Google translation. > > >> I wonder why its have been in this way. Its seems to be professional >> people how have made good things before. >> > I guess there are different people in the organization, some of them > capable, some not so capable. > > EPRI is similar to ELFORSK. At EPRI there were reports by Passel which > were good, reports paid for by EPRI from McKubre et al. which were > excellent, and then there was nonsense published by Tom Schneider such as > the introduction to the book by Hoffman. The book was nonsense raised to > the second power, paid for by the American Nuclear Society. > > - Jed > >
