Guys, I think Doppler Weather and Military radar pulsing 750,000 to 3,000,000 watts 24/7 into the atmosphere is potentially the worst of the offenders. The NEXRAD Doppler weather towers cover a 150 mile radius. In Sitka, Alaska, within that 150 mile radius, the Yellow Cedar trees are slowly wasting/dying, they are having blown/toxic algae blooms, fish/salmon kills and star fish dissolving. To me, that is a sign of penetrating, ionizing radiation. No long term study has ever been done.
Cell towers are around 100,000 watts each tower, I believe, but there are many more of them. I am seeing something similar across the country around NEXRAD/TDWR towers. I am in the process of running the statistics on two years of data in Florida If time does not exist and you can't average those pulses and figure you are OK, you have to consider what those instantaneous pulses are doing to biology 24/7. It is no wonder bees, bats, starfish, trees, chronic wasting disease in animals are increasing as well as Autism and Alzheimers. I think we have F&^%&^% up royally Stewart On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > OTOH … > > > > This could be good news J > > > > At least for those concerned about the risk of brain cancer from > cell-phones, which are in the same UHF frequency range. > > > > Heck, using the same logic (or lack thereof) maybe UHF radiation kills > cancer cells… one would not think that UHF could both promote cancer and > also stifle cellular development in plants, right? > > > > > > > > Ron Wormus wrote: > > > < > http://a-sheep-no-more.blogspot.com/2013/12/9th-grade-science-project-finds-plants_3.html > > > > This would be an interesting experiment to repeat with plants at varying > distance from the same router to see if there's a dose response effect. > Even better would be cellular culture, but that's harder to manage without > a lab. > > I think I will move my router further away from my desktop. > Ron > > >
