The figure of 100,000 watts for a cell phone tower seems a little high.

The most plausible figures from the web seem to be up to 500 watts if they are covering a large area, or somewhat less if it is a small cell in a city.

Nigel
On 12/12/2013 19:21, leaking pen wrote:
Waldo anyone?


On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Guys,

    I think Doppler Weather and Military radar pulsing 750,000 to
    3,000,000 watts 24/7 into the atmosphere is potentially the worst
    of the offenders.  The NEXRAD Doppler weather towers cover a 150
    mile radius.  In Sitka, Alaska, within that 150 mile radius, the
    Yellow Cedar trees are slowly wasting/dying, they are having
    blown/toxic algae blooms, fish/salmon kills and star fish
    dissolving. To me, that is a sign of penetrating, ionizing
    radiation. No long term study has ever been done.

    Cell towers are around 100,000 watts each tower, I believe, but
    there are many more of them.

    I am seeing something similar across the country around
    NEXRAD/TDWR towers.  I am in the process of running the statistics
     on two years of data in Florida

    If time does not exist and you can't average those pulses and
    figure you are OK, you have to consider what those instantaneous
    pulses are doing to biology 24/7.  It is no wonder bees, bats,
    starfish, trees, chronic wasting disease in animals are increasing
    as well as Autism and Alzheimers. I think we have F&^%&^% up royally

    Stewart




    On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        OTOH …

        This could be good news J

        At least for those concerned about the risk of brain cancer
        from cell-phones, which are in the same UHF frequency range.

        Heck, using the same logic (or lack thereof) maybe UHF
        radiation kills cancer cells… one would not think that UHF
        could both promote cancer and also stifle cellular development
        in plants, right?

        Ron Wormus wrote:


        
<http://a-sheep-no-more.blogspot.com/2013/12/9th-grade-science-project-finds-plants_3.html>

        This would be an interesting experiment to repeat with plants
        at varying distance from the same router to see if there's a
        dose response effect.  Even better would be cellular culture,
        but that's harder to manage without a lab.

        I think I will move my router further away from my desktop.
        Ron




Reply via email to