Jed Rothwell December 27th, 2013 at 4:13 PM Hi. You wrote: “1- within March 2014 I think will be completed the first part of the long term validation and the results will be published positive or negative as they might be.” Do you mean the long-term validation performed by ELFORSK? They announced this after they published the first study. I look forward to reading it.
- - - Andrea Rossi December 27th, 2013 at 6:54 PM Jed Rothwell: I mean the third indipendent party validation. I think they are financed by Elforsk, and I am honoured of the fact that Elforsk is investing the money of their shareholders to indagate our work. But, please, consider that we have no connection at all with Elforsk, so I am not sure about my answer. I am sure of the fact that the long term test is made by the third indipendent party and the publication will be made on a peer reviewed magazine hopefully around March. By the way: I made you a promise, you know which, and I don’t forget my promises. I wish you a 2014 successful also for your informatic profession: they told me you are a strong-force informatic. Warm Regards, A.R. - - - Hank Mills December 27th, 2013 at 7:34 PM Dear Andrea, What happens if you do not apply power again once you put the reactor in to self sustained mode? Do the reactions try to run away or will they fade over time? With at least some of your previous reactors, if you did not apply power every so often the reactors would run away. However, in one test the data showed when the input power was cut off the reactions gradually faded over time. - - - Andrea Rossi December 27th, 2013 at 7:56 PM Hank Mills: If we give too much energy to the reactor the temperature raises above the controllability limits and the reactor explodes. We must maintain the drive below this limit, and it is what we are learning to do, trying to reach a controllability level at the highest temperature possible, because the COP raises exponentially with the operation temperature. The apparatus is made by two well separated components, the activator ( “mouse”) and the energy catalyzar ( “Cat”). Now we have a mouse with a COP above 1 and a Cat with a COP with zero energy consumption. If the Mouse excites the cat too much, the cat gets wild and explodes. We must not risk to reach this level. We have seen explode hunderds of reactors now, this way. Warm Regards, A.R. - - - Herb Gillis December 27th, 2013 at 8:52 PM Dr. Rossi: Can you elaborate on how serious an explosion you are talking about? When you say you have seen hundreds of reactors explode I am sure you must appreciate that word (“explode”) does not sound very good out of appropriate context. Do these explosions involve release of radiation outside the reactor housing? Kind Regards; HRG. - - - - Andrea Rossi December 27th, 2013 at 9:13 PM Herb Gillis: Useful comment. The explosions, or destructive tests, are made in controlled modes, in proper lab, with due control of the radiations made by proper instrumentation. I cannot give further information about these data, but we need destructive tests to find the safety limits within which the E-Cats can work in a stabilized operation. Obviously,no ionizing radiations are released outside the safety box in which the reactor is destructed: by the way, just behind the walls of the box there are my Team and ME. Warm Regards, A.R. - - - - Andrea Rossi December 28th, 2013 at 8:48 AM Giuliano Bettini: Yes, the work is promising, but let’s wait the publication to read the consolidated results. So far I must repeat that the output could be negative, the validation work is not completed: never assume you won until the whistle of end game has not been blown. Anyway: now we will estabilish the limits of the allowable excitation with series of destructive tests, then the control engineers will design the final version of the control system for the new limits of the temperature of the high temperature E-Cats ( Hot Cats). Warm Regards, A.R.
