> On Dec 28, 2013, at 9:49, Alan Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jed Rothwell > December 27th, 2013 at 4:13 PM > > Hi. You wrote:
> 113615 after they published the first study. I look forward to reading it. > > - - - > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2013 at 6:54 PM > > Jed Rothwell: I mean the third indipendent party validation. I think they are > financed by Elforsk, and I am honoured of the fact that Elforsk is investing > the money of their shareholders to indagate our work. But, please, consider > that we have no connection at all with Elforsk, so I am not sure about my > answer. I am sure of the fact that the long term test is made by the third > indipendent party and the publication will be made on a peer reviewed > magazine hopefully around March. By the way: I made you a promise, you know > which, and I don’t forget my promises. I wish you a 2014 successful also for > your informatic profession: they told me you are a strong-force informatic. > Warm Regards, A.R. > - - - > > Hank Mills > December 27th, 2013 at 7:34 PM > > Dear Andrea, > > What happens if you do not apply power again once you put the reactor in to > self sustained mode? Do the reactions try to run away or will they fade over > time? With at least some of your previous reactors, if you did not apply > power every so often the reactors would run away. However, in one test the > data showed when the input power was cut off the reactions gradually faded > over time. > > - - - > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2013 at 7:56 PM > > Hank Mills: > If we give too much energy to the reactor the temperature raises above the > controllability limits and the reactor explodes. We must maintain the drive > below this limit, and it is what we are learning to do, trying to reach a > controllability level at the highest temperature possible, because the COP > raises exponentially with the operation temperature. The apparatus is made by > two well separated components, the activator ( “mouse”) and the energy > catalyzar ( “Cat”). Now we have a mouse with a COP above 1 and a Cat with a > COP with zero energy consumption. If the Mouse excites the cat too much, the > cat gets wild and explodes. We must not risk to reach this level. We have > seen explode hunderds of reactors now, this way. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > - - - > Herb Gillis > December 27th, 2013 at 8:52 PM > > Dr. Rossi: > Can you elaborate on how serious an explosion you are talking about? When you > say you have seen hundreds of reactors explode I am sure you must appreciate > that word (“explode”) does not sound very good out of appropriate context. Do > these explosions involve release of radiation outside the reactor housing? > Kind Regards; HRG. > - - - - > > Andrea Rossi > December 27th, 2013 at 9:13 PM > > Herb Gillis: > Useful comment. > The explosions, or destructive tests, are made in controlled modes, in proper > lab, with due control of the radiations made by proper instrumentation. I > cannot give further information about these data, but we need destructive > tests to find the safety limits within which the E-Cats can work in a > stabilized operation. Obviously,no ionizing radiations are released outside > the safety box in which the reactor is destructed: by the way, just behind > the walls of the box there are my Team and ME. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > - - - - > Andrea Rossi > December 28th, 2013 at 8:48 AM > > Giuliano Bettini: > Yes, the work is promising, but let’s wait the publication to read the > consolidated results. So far I must repeat that the output could be negative, > the validation work is not completed: never assume you won until the whistle > of end game has not been blown. Anyway: now we will estabilish the limits of > the allowable excitation with series of destructive tests, then the control > engineers will design the final version of the control system for the new > limits of the temperature of the high temperature E-Cats ( Hot Cats). > Warm Regards, > A.R. >
