Rossi’s latest words do not make sense. He states that the mouse suppresses the cat when it is activated.
But this mouse behavior is inherently dangerous. If the power goes out when the cat needs the mouse to suppress temperature rise, the mouse is not available and the reactor will overheat and be destroyed. A power failure must cause the cat to die and that only can happen when the mouse stimulates the cat when the mouse receives power from the external power source. On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:13 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > > The latest discussion of the mouse having a reverse relationship to the >> main cat does seem out of line unless he is using words to obscure the >> meaning. >> > > This was my thought, too. I wonder if Daniel Rocha's detail concerning > MgH had any connection to this. > > Eric > >
