I remember that he was talking of the risk of power outage, and that they anticipated that . It looked strange for me since I imagined that without power it would simply die... Now it looks clearer.
I don't know if it is real, but sure a negative retro-action is needed, and that it is done through electricity is a good point. as I said, maybe it is possible through 90 degree phase shift done by each of the chained LENR reactor, as if they were producing heat proportionally to a power increase and not to power value.... I imagine Rossi is not enough precise and the control is more subtle than my proposal... Since it is controlled by bang-bang cycles it seems more subtle than my linear system vision. 2014/1/1 Axil Axil <[email protected]> > Rossi’s latest words do not make sense. He states that the mouse > suppresses the cat when it is activated. > > > > But this mouse behavior is inherently dangerous. If the power goes out > when the cat needs the mouse to suppress temperature rise, the mouse is not > available and the reactor will overheat and be destroyed. > > > > A power failure must cause the cat to die and that only can happen when > the mouse stimulates the cat when the mouse receives power from the > external power source. > > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 7:13 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> The latest discussion of the mouse having a reverse relationship to the >>> main cat does seem out of line unless he is using words to obscure the >>> meaning. >>> >> >> This was my thought, too. I wonder if Daniel Rocha's detail concerning >> MgH had any connection to this. >> >> Eric >> >> >
