Nanoplasmonics can explain tritium production as well as helium production. See
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg83012.html On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil, > > NAE "traps" seem to exist in many forms. DGT seems to have fabricated > "magnetic" traps facilitated by Nano-antennae, which is what you are > referencing. Meulenberg-Sinha in their Extended Lochon elaborate on > electrostatic traps initiated by phonons emanating from linear defects (or > "Nano-cracks"). Even in Ed's theory there is a variety of "trap", wherein > the walls of the NAE become sufficiently loaded with charge so to > facilitate the formation and "trapping" of Hydroton chains. There is no > monopoly on "trap" methodology it would appear. > > As far as Shoulders goes, again, the EVO does not explain He4 or tritium. > I think it may contribute to the overall reaction output as a secondary or > tertiary reaction, and may in fact be the reason we see transmutations with > no radioactive products. But we have to figure out whether deuterium or > tritium is produced in NiH before we jump to any real conclusions. > > As far as Ed's objection that the EVO is only created in spark discharge > plasma, Shoulders also speculates EVO in wet-systems is formed through > sono-luminescent bubble ejections striking the cathode. So I'm not sure > that objection is all that valid, because theoretically EVO could form in > standard electrolysis PdD. But again it in no way accounts for He4 or > tritium in these systems (and neither does hot fracto-fusion account for > these ash either). > > Regards, > John > > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ken Shoulders has captured the fundament LENR reaction in a experimental >> picture he took. >> >> In more detail, a picture of the dark mode localized magnetic traps (LMT) >> can be found in the Ken Shoulders paper on Figure 5 and 6 on page 4 >> sited in this vortex post as follows: >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg80263.html >> >> Let us discuss this >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Foks0904 . <foks0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> *I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of >>> transmutation in spark production* >>> >>> I continue to wonder how EVO factors into LENR, if at all. Shoulders has >>> observed that for whatever reason his experiments do not produce >>> radioactive elements, similar to LENR transmutation results. Now >>> unfortunately, like all vacuum energy hypotheses, EVO does not explain the >>> Heat/Helium correlation nor tritium production in PdD. Once we know whether >>> deuterium and tritium are being produced in NiH, we'll be better able to >>> predict the relevance of EVO in that system. >>> >>> I suspect that there are about 3-4 different types of reactions >>> intermingling in all systems. The main reaction is some kind of cluster >>> fusion phenomenon that produces the nuclear level excess heat and >>> dissipates nuclear products slowly through photons and phonons. The >>> secondary and tertiary phenomenon may include Cavitation, Casmir Forces, >>> EVO, and/or Fracto-Fusion. All speculation of course. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> One manifestation of the LENR reaction that your theoretical thinking >>>> has been very weak on is the explanation of the Rossi reactor meltdown when >>>> high temperature material can melt at temperatures in excess of 2000C. >>>> >>>> Will you now attempt to explain how this high heat event can occur, >>>> and explain the details of how this particular reaction can happen? >>>> >>>> I believe that the extremes of a reaction can reveal the detailed >>>> essence of the reaction. >>>> >>>> I also wonder if you will cover Ken Shoulders discovery of >>>> transmutation in spark production as well as transmutation produced in the >>>> proton 21 experiment? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Edmund Storms >>>> <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Axil, this insight will be provided in a book that will take my first >>>>> book, written in 2007, to the present and show how the observations have >>>>> been explained and how they can be better explained without conflict with >>>>> what is known. Unfortunately, so many different opinions exists in the >>>>> field, no one would believe what I propose without the complete evidence >>>>> only a book can provide. >>>>> >>>>> Too many attempts at creating a theory are based on pure imagination >>>>> without any relationship to reality or to what is actually observed. >>>>> People >>>>> simply do not read the literature. This is understandable because about >>>>> 2000 papers must be found and read, which is a full time job. Enough >>>>> information is now available to make rejection of most theories possible >>>>> and to identify where the unique mechanism functions in the process. >>>>> Nothing about the process conflicts with what is known. The unique >>>>> mechanism is new and I predict the full understanding will warrant a Nobel >>>>> prize by someone in the distant future. The best analogy to past >>>>> discoveries would be the realization by Pauli that a neutrino-like >>>>> particle >>>>> existed based on how the energy of beta decay was found to be less than >>>>> the >>>>> required mass-energy change. Until then, people had no clue such a >>>>> particle >>>>> was possible. In the case of LENR, a new force is revealed that is hidden >>>>> in plain sight in exactly the same way. A person only needs to know where >>>>> to look. >>>>> >>>>> My book will describe my path to a solution. Of course, this will open >>>>> the door to another rejection event by all the theoreticians and everyone >>>>> who thinks they know how the effect works. But, then the book will speak >>>>> for itself without my having to waste time in endless debate. >>>>> >>>>> Ed Storms >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm in the process of studying all the explanations and comparing >>>>>> them to what is known in LENR and in general science. The failure to make >>>>>> progress in explaining LENR is easy to see and a clear path to the >>>>>> correct >>>>>> explanation is becoming obvious, at least to me. The problem has a >>>>>> solution if you know where to look. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I am sure that all here want to get a preview of this emerging >>>>>> solution. Is it possible to reveal to us a preview? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
