"but you seem to want to make a centerpiece of your arbitrary assessment and no one can figure out why"
Not at all. I have a history of successfully making such 'arbitrary' assessments based on speculation / gossip / rumours / second hand information .. generally by measuring the credibility of the individuals that I gather such information from. Which leads me to my next question.. What would your estimate be? Probably more interesting than mine. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Foks0904 . <[email protected]> wrote: > *What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for > saying 35%. * > > *But the reality is 99% of the scientific world probably thinks I'm a > total crank for putting that much faith into Rossi.* > > I'm more interested to know how you arrived at that number. By factoring > in totally unrelated news about BLP and McKubre? Go ahead and put 35%, > everyone has a different opinion, almost all equally valid (beyond > denialism), but you seem to want to make a centerpiece of your arbitrary > assessment and no one can figure out why. That's why its annoying, not > because it runs contrary to our own personal beliefs as to the legitimacy > of the technology. > > Regards, > John > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> What I find fascinating is you guys probably think I'm a downer for >> saying 35%. >> >> But the reality is 99% of the scientific world probably thinks I'm a >> total crank for putting that much faith into Rossi. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:31 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> At this point I would have to be shown iron clad evidence that the ECAT >>> does not generate additional heat beyond what is used for drive. That >>> would have to fall into the upper 90's. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 4:24 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to >>> 35% >>> >>> So, Dave, I guess you're at .. what? 95%? 90%? >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> John, it does seem rather arbitrary how his game works and hopefully >>>> he can help me understand it better. Does anyone actually risk capital on >>>> this issue? >>>> >>>> I have seen plenty of proof that Rossi has the real deal and I can not >>>> imagine how additional proof will make a difference to many others. The >>>> skeptics will all howl as usual with MY taking the lead. The only way that >>>> the world will accept that Rossi's ECAT is real is for them to be placed in >>>> common usage. There has been more than enough evidence already >>>> demonstrated. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Foks0904 . <[email protected]> >>>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Thu, Jan 16, 2014 3:48 pm >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, >>>> to 35% >>>> >>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news >>>> coming out of BLP and McKubre. >>>> >>>> Yesterday you were complaining about how stupid BLP and >>>> McKubre/Brillouin are and how "annoying" they were behaving. Now you see >>>> value in these reports, why? And you associate them with Rossi, why? >>>> >>>> You're all over the place Blaze, and your off-the-cuff guesstimating >>>> is beyond arbitrary. Why not just follow your own advice from yesterday >>>> and keep meaningless information yourself as well? >>>> >>>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next >>>> indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. >>>> >>>> Ditto. That's going to be exciting when it lands. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> John >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news coming >>>>> out of BLP and McKubre. >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next >>>>> indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo Corporation MIAMI - FL >>>>>> - USA previous job was: >>>>>> >>>>>> " Frelance >>>>>> Consultant<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&title=Frelance+Consultant&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true¤tTitle=CP&trk=prof-exp-title> >>>>>> European >>>>>> Gaming and Gambling Tech >>>>>> Market<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name> >>>>>> " >>>>>> >>>>>> -4% >>>>>> >>>>>> Now back to 31%. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This is based on >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>>>>>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>>>>>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>>>>>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. Could be >>>>>>> updating this probability more frequently. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
