Dear Mike, A new theory is only as good as the predictions that it can make that are latter proven to be true. Einstein made predictions that were proven true superseded and extended the laws of *Newton*.
Where are the list of predictions made by the Mills theories that will extend existing laws? When I see that these predictions are supported by new experimental results, then Mills theory will no doubt gain acceptance. When the Mills reactor proves successful and can be improved by applying Mills theory, then Mills theory will be more broadly taken seriously. For one thing, having spent little time understanding Mills ideas if someone knows, why does the Mills reaction need a spark to activate the hydrino formation process? A energy hole will extract energy from a close by hydrogen bound electron when the catalyst gets within a close range. A spark is a high energy item. It’s a seeming contradiction that a high energy event can cause an electron to lose energy. This I don't yet understand. On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Mike Carrell <[email protected]> wrote: > Beauty indeed comes from truth, ad Mills’ GUTCP is very beautiful. > > > > What is easily missed is the tradition that a pioneer in science should > carefully document his discovery so others can follow, and that he should > address the principal features of accepted knowledge if his discovery > impacts those features. This **is** what GUTCP is all about. Many have > attempted a GUT and failed, including Einstein. An introduction and the > orbitsphere derivation are in Vol.1, along with much else. Experimental > evidence for hydrinos is outlined in the Technical Presentation on the > website, with details in journal papers. > > > > The salient beautiful feature of Mills’ work is that he has a consistent > system of mathematical description over 85 orders of magnitude using only > measured constants. This supersedes the complexities of Quantum Mechanics, > which has been fashionable for the last century. Acceptance of Mills’ work > may be quite gradual. Einstein, for example got his Nobel Prize not or > Relativity, but for earlier elucidation of the photoelectric effect. > > > > Mike Carrell > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, January 18, 2014 5:16 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:BLP's announcement > > > > Beauty comes from truth. > > > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:14 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:47:17 -0500: > Hi, > [snip] > > >We must accept that hydrinos exist because Mills has experimentally > >demonstrated them. But we do not need to accept the 1700 pages of theory > >that Mill uses to explain them. There are other explanations that are > >easier to swallow. > > Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. ;) > > > > > >http://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.5194v1.pdf > > > >Fractional spin and charge is a result of delocalization of the electron > in > >strongly correlated systems. > > > > > > > >The spin and charge seem to wander away from the electron in condensed > >matter systems do to wave function sharing among many electrons. > > > > > > > >It is well known, this fractional spin and charge causes problems in > >chemistry associated with the dissociation of molecular ions, > >polarizabilities, barrier heights, magnetic properties, fundamental > >band-gaps and strongly-correlated systems. > > > > > > > >Could what Mills sees is a electron delocalization condition in a strongly > >correlated chemical system? > > > > > > > >The paper above lays the conditions for fractional spins, charge and > >orbitals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 20:38:39 -0500: > >> Hi, > >> [snip] > >> > >> I meant individual atoms, and I realize that clusters would probably > have > >> somewhat different energy levels, however it would be very coincidental > if > >> these > >> exactly matched Hydrino energy levels. > >> The author of the paper on IRH, that has previously been mentioned on > this > >> list, > >> claims that it has only one level, whereas the Hydrino has over a > hundred. > >> > >> >Don't you mean to say that Rydberg clusters don't have multiple energy > >> >levels and characteristic transition energies, which are seen in > Hydrino > >> >experiments? > >> > > >> > > >> >On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:08 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 16 Jan 2014 16:26:06 -0500: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> >How does Mills theory distinguish been orbitals in a atom verses > >> orbitals > >> >> >in small atomic Rydberg cluster of 10 atoms or less. I say the Mills > >> >> >experiments can't. > >> >> [snip] > >> >> Rydberg atoms don't have multiple energy levels and characteristic > >> >> transition > >> >> energies, which are seen in Hydrino experiments. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Robin van Spaandonk > >> >> > >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >> >> > >> >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Robin van Spaandonk > >> > >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >> > >> > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. > Department. >
