"all deluded and incompetent... or maybe... maybe someone else is deluded."
Maybe a little aggressive :D On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]>wrote: > > http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cocktail-party-physics/2014/01/25/physics-week-in-review-january-25-2014/#comment-1011 > > > too funny. > > I will see if my coment is published... > > not too aggressive (you can check): > > "High, not the least doubt on E-cat after it is backed by Cherokee fund, > by Elforsk, by Chinese in Baoding HIDZ ? > > Did you ever read "Excess Heat" by Charles Beaudette (PDF available on Uni > Tsinghua ICCF9 site, by the author)... > If you don't agree with his position, he have many citations, unlike many > books on the same subject... you can check your beliefs... > > do you know more critics on the calorimetry, othjer than the only 4 > calorimetry critics that are all rebuted and abandonned ? > Is there any compatible with recent result to explain the many publication > (mincluding peer-reviewed by mainstream magazine like JJAP or Journal of > Electroanalytical chemistry)? > > what would make you change opinion (probably it is already done and you > don't know it, or it is not scientific) > > you should really read data, read Beaudette, or some executive summary on > LENR, to avoid being surprised like the majority of uninformed people. > > Did you know DoE todays accept LENR projects for IDEA funding. > That NASA pays Doug Wells for 2013-2014 seedling project on LENR plane > propulsion > That DoD fund LENR hidden as nanotech (it is also). > That US navy replicates ENEA and SRI experiments. > that Elforsk (the Swedish EPRI) publicly supported E-cat after having > funded the test that convinced Cherokee. > > all deluded and incompetent... > or maybe... > maybe someone else is deluded. > > who invoke conspiracy theories ? who simply used Groupthink theory, which > is validated by many recent scandal (look for roland beabou groupthing > article on collective delusions). > > good reading." >
