That is right Harry.  Nobody cares about how big it can be. :-)

Actually, the integer orbitspheres of Mills include all integer values which is 
like the quantum theory as I understand.  Practical values are limited by how 
easy it is to ionize the big atoms at an integer value that is far less than 
infinity.

This subject is one that surprises me in at least one major way.  Mills 
predicts the atom size as being proportional to the integer directly while 
quantum physics suggests that it varies as the square.  This is a huge 
difference and I can not imagine why the correct rule has not been clearly 
established.  How could an atom be 10 times larger(int =10) in one calculation 
than the next without being obvious?

Perhaps this discrepancy has been shown and I am not aware.  Does anyone know 
of an accurate measurement for an excited hydrogen diameter that supports one 
of these theories?

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sun, Jan 26, 2014 5:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory





While people debate how small a hydrogen atom can be, there seems to be no 
debate about how big a hydrogen atom can be. 


Harry  




On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:06 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:

I guess that is what it boils down to Eric.  I would much rather have the 
series continue indefinitely as I have been discussing.  i.e. 
(1/2,1/3,...1/137,1/138...1/infinity)  which would blend nicely with the other 
integer portion that we all assume is real.  If the total series is found to be 
valid, then there is no special consideration needed for the 1/137 term.

But, we must abide by natural laws and most times they do not care what we 
prefer. :(

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sun, Jan 26, 2014 4:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills's theory



On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:55 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:




The theory is a photon like zitterbewegung model describing states that retain 
locality in phase space with circular cycles of a trapped photon representing 
the usual eigenstates.  The Maxwell quanta hbar(c) becomes a classical angular 
momentum quanta in phase space with quantum number 137 attached.




Ah, gotcha.  Thank you.  Hence also the electron "becoming a photon" as it 
approaches the lowest level.


Now we have to decide whether we can live with a series { 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, ..., 
1/136, alpha(N) }.  (Or something like that.)


Eric








Reply via email to