*Fran, I think you might want to look into negative energy production.* *In a previous post titled "squeezed light". I have explained that the NAE produces squeezed light based on the up and down shifting of light frequencies seen in the photons constrained in an optical cavity.*
*Squeezed light is one of the mechanisms that are cited as the origin for negative energy production. This zone of negative energy is a volume where vacuum energy is reduced to a value that lower than is typically found in the ordinary space and the Casmir force is reduced or completely removed.* *In this volume, light may exceed its constant value because in this zone the electrical and magnetic properties of the vacuum are reduced, and a space time worm hole may develop. I am just following the dots.* On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, Ed it sounds strange but my position has always been based on a > caveat to COE that says random motion of gas can never be exploited.. IMHO > these gas atoms are translated via the Ni geometry and will normally return > to ground state unexploited as their local geometry changes with random > motion, the caveat I am suggesting becomes an option when we heavily load > the Ni geometry with gas such that the fractional h atoms exiting the > geometry do not have the room to return to normal ground state which by > itself still gains you nothing but which opens the door for all these > different theories by accumulating these fractional atoms seeking to return > to ground state. I am keeping an open mind to ALL the various theories for > energy creation but my reason for promoting Arto's theory was wrt his > perspective on Casimir geometry and the way he illustrates the field > turning to propel the gas atoms down into these smaller regions where they > appear to be lower than ground state.. although not using the same language > as I it appears he is coming to the same conclusions as to the originating > source of the energy.. I am not too fond of the "neutral atoms" he is > suggesting but I think he has a better handle than most on what is setting > the stage. > > Fran > > *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* Edmund Storms > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR > > > > Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has to > climb over a Coulomb barrier having a charge of 28. We know how hard > getting over a change of 1 is, so how is this barrier overcome so easily? > Second, each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the role > of the so called catalyst. This magic catalyst would have to move from Ni > to Ni as each was converted to Cu because apparently the magic catalyst is > not able to add H to copper or apparently to any thing else. Each small > particle of Ni would have to contain the magic catalyst and a large > fraction of the Ni would have to be converted to Cu in order to account for > the energy being claimed. Common sense is violated! Can people please > consider the obvious and necessary consequences before applying pure > imagination? In addition, we have no evidence that Cu is produced. Rossi > even has withdrawn this claim. > > > > Ed Storms > > On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote: > > > > > > > > Just saw this: > > > http://ecatsuomi.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/arto-lauri-i-will-take-on-how-the-e-cat-works/ > > > > pix http://ecatsuomi.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/arto_lauri_proposal1.png > > > > > > I think Arto is very close if not exactly on target with this theory for > the ecat.. IMHO he defines the fractional hydrogen as neutral wrt the Ni > atom where I would say they are relativistic and held this way by the bulk > of loaded gas occupying the unrelativistic space that prevents the > fractional hydrogen from translating back to normal as the suppressing > geometry is left behind via random motion ..this pressure then discounts > the barrier and allows the dilated atom to slip "behind" the Ni atom on > temporal coordinate and may be why this effect requires heavy loading such > that the fractional atom doesn't have opportunity to slip back into normal > ground state anywhere in the surrounding region... accumulating hydrinos that > are denied the opportunity to return to normal after having left the > geometry that caused their condition. > > Fran > > >
