Also if each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the role of the so called catalyst it would be as part of "casimir" group not individually - and as the tapestry changes wrt a moving gas atom it will experience changes in this field - dynamic casimir effect. I am not even sure that transmutation would effect that field as long as the element remains metal and does not significantly change the local geometry the casimir force should remain unchanged.. IMHO it is a difference of scales where the same HUP responsible for the random motion of the gas atoms at the lower scale can be unbalanced and accumulated at a higher scale by the Ni. [1/plate spacing ^3] to form regions with different values of casimir force. Fran
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Edmund Storms Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has to climb over a Coulomb barrier having a charge of 28. We know how hard getting over a change of 1 is, so how is this barrier overcome so easily? Second, each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the role of the so called catalyst. This magic catalyst would have to move from Ni to Ni as each was converted to Cu because apparently the magic catalyst is not able to add H to copper or apparently to any thing else. Each small particle of Ni would have to contain the magic catalyst and a large fraction of the Ni would have to be converted to Cu in order to account for the energy being claimed. Common sense is violated! Can people please consider the obvious and necessary consequences before applying pure imagination? In addition, we have no evidence that Cu is produced. Rossi even has withdrawn this claim. Ed Storms On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote: Just saw this: http://ecatsuomi.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/arto-lauri-i-will-take-on-how-the-e-cat-works/ pix http://ecatsuomi.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/arto_lauri_proposal1.png I think Arto is very close if not exactly on target with this theory for the ecat.. IMHO he defines the fractional hydrogen as neutral wrt the Ni atom where I would say they are relativistic and held this way by the bulk of loaded gas occupying the unrelativistic space that prevents the fractional hydrogen from translating back to normal as the suppressing geometry is left behind via random motion ..this pressure then discounts the barrier and allows the dilated atom to slip "behind" the Ni atom on temporal coordinate and may be why this effect requires heavy loading such that the fractional atom doesn't have opportunity to slip back into normal ground state anywhere in the surrounding region... accumulating hydrinos that are denied the opportunity to return to normal after having left the geometry that caused their condition. Fran
