reference: http://antapex.org/it_15.pdf
http://www.earthtech.org/publications/davis_STAIF_conference_1.pdf On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > *Fran, I think you might want to look into negative energy production.* > > *In a previous post titled "squeezed light". I have explained that the NAE > produces squeezed light based on the up and down shifting of light > frequencies seen in the photons constrained in an optical cavity.* > > > > *Squeezed light is one of the mechanisms that are cited as the origin for > negative energy production. This zone of negative energy is a volume where > vacuum energy is reduced to a value that lower than is typically found in > the ordinary space and the Casmir force is reduced or completely removed.* > > > > *In this volume, light may exceed its constant value because in this zone > the electrical and magnetic properties of the vacuum are reduced, and a > space time worm hole may develop. I am just following the dots.* > > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, Ed it sounds strange but my position has always been based on a >> caveat to COE that says random motion of gas can never be exploited.. IMHO >> these gas atoms are translated via the Ni geometry and will normally return >> to ground state unexploited as their local geometry changes with random >> motion, the caveat I am suggesting becomes an option when we heavily load >> the Ni geometry with gas such that the fractional h atoms exiting the >> geometry do not have the room to return to normal ground state which by >> itself still gains you nothing but which opens the door for all these >> different theories by accumulating these fractional atoms seeking to return >> to ground state. I am keeping an open mind to ALL the various theories for >> energy creation but my reason for promoting Arto's theory was wrt his >> perspective on Casimir geometry and the way he illustrates the field >> turning to propel the gas atoms down into these smaller regions where they >> appear to be lower than ground state.. although not using the same language >> as I it appears he is coming to the same conclusions as to the originating >> source of the energy.. I am not too fond of the "neutral atoms" he is >> suggesting but I think he has a better handle than most on what is setting >> the stage. >> >> Fran >> >> *From:* Edmund Storms [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Friday, January 31, 2014 12:06 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Cc:* Edmund Storms >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Higgs and LENR >> >> >> >> Fran, do you realize how strange this explanation sounds? The H has to >> climb over a Coulomb barrier having a charge of 28. We know how hard >> getting over a change of 1 is, so how is this barrier overcome so easily? >> Second, each Ni nucleus in the sea of Ni would have to experience the role >> of the so called catalyst. This magic catalyst would have to move from Ni >> to Ni as each was converted to Cu because apparently the magic catalyst is >> not able to add H to copper or apparently to any thing else. Each small >> particle of Ni would have to contain the magic catalyst and a large >> fraction of the Ni would have to be converted to Cu in order to account for >> the energy being claimed. Common sense is violated! Can people please >> consider the obvious and necessary consequences before applying pure >> imagination? In addition, we have no evidence that Cu is produced. Rossi >> even has withdrawn this claim. >> >> >> >> Ed Storms >> >> On Jan 31, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Just saw this: >> >> >> http://ecatsuomi.wordpress.com/2014/01/30/arto-lauri-i-will-take-on-how-the-e-cat-works/ >> >> >> >> pix http://ecatsuomi.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/arto_lauri_proposal1.png >> >> >> >> >> >> I think Arto is very close if not exactly on target with this theory for >> the ecat.. IMHO he defines the fractional hydrogen as neutral wrt the Ni >> atom where I would say they are relativistic and held this way by the bulk >> of loaded gas occupying the unrelativistic space that prevents the >> fractional hydrogen from translating back to normal as the suppressing >> geometry is left behind via random motion ..this pressure then discounts >> the barrier and allows the dilated atom to slip "behind" the Ni atom on >> temporal coordinate and may be why this effect requires heavy loading such >> that the fractional atom doesn't have opportunity to slip back into normal >> ground state anywhere in the surrounding region... accumulating hydrinos that >> are denied the opportunity to return to normal after having left the >> geometry that caused their condition. >> >> Fran >> >> >> > >
