If Mills discloses he deserves credit for that. By "discloses" I mean what the patent office means: Provides sufficient information in the patent disclosure for those skilled in the art to realize beneficial use independent of the inventor.
By "the art" I clearly do not mean HHO/energy from water/etc. I mean whatever conventional technologies are combined to realize beneficial use of the invention. On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Those who have been around the alternative energy scene for long enough are > certainly aware of the niche which is now called simply "HHO". The name is > loaded - it implies that there is a fundamental difference in two forms of > split water. HHO was once called "hydroxy" or Browns gas and is not fully > split into H2 and O2. It is claimed to retain special properties. > > The broader field derived from the devices and claims of Garrett, Rhodes, > Yull Brown, Puharich, the Graneau's, Stanley Meyer, Santilli, Boyce, Daniel > Dingle, Rustum Roy/Kanzius and many others who published information (some > scientific, some anecdotal) on various aspects of water energy anomalies, > often in the presence of electrical fields, either via electrolysis, RF, > direct arc or cavitation. Wiki has an article on the scam aspects, which > sadly excludes the actual science. No surprise that Wiki is taking sides in > another controversial subject. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car > > Mills new paper should be read in that context. Basically it is an HHO > paper, which is cleverly disguised as something else in order to shoehorn > it > into a theory (and especially into IP) which does may or may not apply, due > to the vast amount of prior art. > > http://www.blacklightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/papers/ContHOH.pdf > > Normally in science, the author strives to gives credit to prior art, but > apparently Mills is above that. OTOH his numerous supporters and shills > will > proudly trumpet, probably in response to this post, that Mills has finally > explained what the others before him have seen glimpses of - and he owes no > duty to actually lower his status to their level, by way of > acknowledgement. > Maybe so. > > "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" George > Santayana > > >
