On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> *From:* James Bowery > > > > If Mills discloses he deserves credit for that. > > > > By "discloses" I mean what the patent office means: Provides sufficient > information in the patent disclosure for those skilled in the art to > realize beneficial use independent of the inventor. > > > > You've seen his recent patent application. Even at 325 pages - does it > disclose anything that the other patents relating to electrical discharge > through water have missed? > You misunderstand my point. My point is operationally defined as follows: People have been making all kind of noises and filing all kinds of patents and we don't have anything on the market or even in the open laboratory remotely like the energy production system claimed by Mills. If after all that, on the basis of Mills' patent people are able to reproduce his energy production without Mills' assistance, his patent is valid and he should become fabulously wealthy assuming someone else doesn't come up with a workaround based on other principles of operation. QED
