On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Cook
>
> > My thoughts : since H doesn't easily diffuse into Ni (Unlike D in Pd)
> it's more likely to be a surface effect.
>
>
> Perhaps - but misleading. Pure nickel is not a great proton conductor- and
> one must pay dearly to get pure nickel. But why?
>
> It takes only a small amount of selected other metals, as alloying agents
> for nickel, to far exceed palladium. For instance, 95% nickel and 5%
> palladium is superior to palladium, at a fraction of the cost.
>
> There is a wealth of data on hydrogen storage alloys which tends to be
> overlooked as candidate alloys for LENR.
>
> Jones
>
>
I think Swartz said in Friday's 2014 MIT video that his lastest NANOR
composed of Ni and Pd.

harry

Reply via email to