On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob Cook >> >> > My thoughts : since H doesn't easily diffuse into Ni (Unlike D in Pd) >> it's more likely to be a surface effect. >> >> >> Perhaps - but misleading. Pure nickel is not a great proton conductor- >> and one must pay dearly to get pure nickel. But why? >> >> It takes only a small amount of selected other metals, as alloying agents >> for nickel, to far exceed palladium. For instance, 95% nickel and 5% >> palladium is superior to palladium, at a fraction of the cost. >> >> There is a wealth of data on hydrogen storage alloys which tends to be >> overlooked as candidate alloys for LENR. >> >> Jones >> >> > I think Swartz said in Friday's 2014 MIT video that his lastest NANOR > composed of Ni and Pd. > > harry > uh sorry his older versions of NANOR use Ni and Pd. Harry
