To: *Toddsterpatriot* Kevmo: We could go and look at the sun long before that money was spent,
Toddiot: Yes, and the sun is proof that fusion can produce useful amounts of energy. ***Yup, if you're 93 million miles away. And the fact that we spent hundreds of $billions and all we have to show for it is the ability to look at the sun and bask in it, WTF was that money spent on? We KNOW that CHF funds were NOT spent on solar power cells. We are no closer to controlling Hot Fusion than we are to time travel, but we've got a multihundred $Billion bill to pay. We paid for absolutely NOTHING. It was a fraud. What is the proof for "cold-fusion"? Rossi's (H2O2) reactor? LOL! ***All Rossi, all the time. The proof for cold fusion is in the 14000 replications. And other strong evidence, 32 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=32#32> posted on *Thu 06 Feb 2014 06:51:17 PM PST* by Kevmo <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have seen some skeptopaths say that an HBomb is an example of Controlled > Hot Fusion (CHF). This is, of course, an extremely stupid position. An > HBomb is an UNcontrolled reaction. We have pissed hundreds of $billions > trying to CONTROL that reaction, such as with lasers, magnetic confinement, > and other things. What is the result, after spending so much money trying > to control the HBomb? Nothing. > > The following interaction is an example. It is also useful because he > hints that Solar Energy is an example of CHF, even though CHF funds NEVER > went into solar power. NEVER. > > http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=23#23 > > > To: *Kevmo* > Right, because no one has ever *seen* useful amounts of energy produced > by fusion. > > It's like arguing with a deaf 2 year old. > 23 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=23#23>posted on > *Wed > 05 Feb 2014 08:46:23 PM PST* by > Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is > hard. Harder if you're stupid.) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=23>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.23;reftype=comment>| > To > 21 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#21> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=23> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=23>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Toddsterpatriot* > > By ALL FREEPING MEANS, post where ANY amount of Useful Energy has been > produced by CHF. H-Bombs are not an example of CHF. But if you want to > argue from that premise, it will be useful for the asked & answered offsite > knowlege storage & reference. > > 24 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=24#24>posted on > *Wed > 05 Feb 2014 09:02:04 PM PST* by Kevmo > <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter > how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=24>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.24;reftype=comment>| > To > 23 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#23> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=24> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=24>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Kevmo* > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy > > 25 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=25#25>posted on > *Wed > 05 Feb 2014 09:27:12 PM PST* by > Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is > hard. Harder if you're stupid.) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=25>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.25;reftype=comment>| > To > 24 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#24> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=25> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=25>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Toddsterpatriot* > > That is a demonstration of supposedly Controlled Hot Fusion? Where does > 'fusion' occur within those solar cells? It doesn't. Everyone knows that > except you. Your CHF fraud boys produced Zip, as usual. > > 26 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=26#26>posted on > *Wed > 05 Feb 2014 09:32:41 PM PST* by Kevmo > <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter > how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=26>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.26;reftype=comment>| > To > 25 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#25> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=26> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=26>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Kevmo* > Right, because no one has ever *seen* useful amounts of energy produced > by fusion. > > Deaf and blind. > 27 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=27#27>posted on > *Thu > 06 Feb 2014 06:08:38 AM PST* by > Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is > hard. Harder if you're stupid.) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=27>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.27;reftype=comment>| > To > 26 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#26> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=27> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=27>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Toddsterpatriot* > > There is nothing controlled nor useful about an H-Bomb. It is > UNcontrolled. It's the difference between 13th century Chinese gunpowder > bombs and 21st century Internal Combustion Engines. 700 years difference, > control vs. uncontrolled. But someone as ignorant as you is calling an > Hbomb "useful" amounts of energy produced. Go ahead and stand next to one > and let it go off to prove to us how useful it is to you. > > 28 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=28#28>posted on > *Thu > 06 Feb 2014 01:57:29 PM PST* by Kevmo > <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter > how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=28>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.28;reftype=comment>| > To > 27 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#27> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=28> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=28>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Kevmo* > Damn, you're denser than osmium. > > *There is nothing controlled nor useful about an H-Bomb. It is > UNcontrolled. * > > I've never heard of an H-bomb going off accidentally. Have you? > > I'm pretty sure most H-bomb tests were successful. > > Seems controlled to me. > > *But someone as ignorant as you is calling an Hbomb "useful" amounts of > energy produced. * > > Can you read? Right, because no one has ever *seen* useful amounts of > energy produced by fusion. > > Are you under the impression that the only fusion we've seen was in an > H-bomb? > 29 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#29>posted on > *Thu > 06 Feb 2014 05:24:24 PM PST* by > Toddsterpatriot<http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Etoddsterpatriot/>(Science is > hard. Harder if you're stupid.) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=29>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.29;reftype=comment>| > To > 28 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#28> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=29> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=29>] > ------------------------------ > To: *Toddsterpatriot* > > Damn, you're denser than osmium. > ***which would make you as stupid as a bag of rocks. > > I've never heard of an H-bomb going off accidentally. Have you? > ***Case in point, right here. Just look how incredibly stupid your > argument is. Your argument is that because you can decide WHEN it's going > to blow up, that is an example of CHF. So, after hundreds of $billions > trying to control this reaction, the best we have is an on switch, no off > switch, and entire populations vaporized. That is YOUR example of > controlled hot fusion, a hot fusion car, a hot fusion water heater, a hot > fusion jet pack. I'd be more than happy to stand for an hour next to a Cold > Fusion reaction; and it would make me happy to see you stand for just a few > seconds next to your shining example of Controlled Hot Fusion while it's > turned on, as long as I'm a continent away. > > I'm pretty sure most H-bomb tests were successful. > ***And we've spent hundreds of $billions trying to control that reaction > so we can use it. By your own admission, the only "control" we have over > the reaction is when to turn it on. In the meantime, guys like Hagelstein > are running Cold Fusion cells for MONTHS. My goodness, it just boggles the > imagination to see someone so stupid as to promote an atom bomb as an > example of a controlled, useful reaction. You can't be that stupid. But > when we look over your posts, yup, you are that stupid. > > Seems controlled to me. > ***Yup. You ARE that stupid. > > Kevmo: But someone as ignorant as you is calling an Hbomb "useful" amounts > of energy produced. > > Toddiot: Can you read? Right, because no one has ever seen useful amounts > of energy produced by fusion. > ***So, it's so useful to you? Hundreds of $billions have been spent trying > to control the power of the hbomb, and what do we have to show for it? The > fact you can SEE it from afar? That's USEFUL? Keep in mind this is money > spent well after the HBomb was produced. Its aim was directly to turn it > into a useful and controlled energy source. The best we have is that we can > stand 100 miles away and SEE an HBomb go off. And that's supposedly > hundreds of $millions well spent. Only a stupid person could hold such a > position. And you DO hold such a position. > > Are you under the impression that the only fusion we've seen was in an > H-bomb? > ***No, we've seen fusion in that star that hangs in the sky. So, now your > position is that we've spent hundreds of $billions trying to control this > HBomb reaction and the best we have to show for controlled hot fusion is > that you can go outside and look at the sun? WTF? What was that money > fraudulently spent on? We could go and look at the sun long before that > money was spent, and if only 2% of it were spent on Cold Fusion instead of > CHF, we'd have LENR cars by now. > > 30 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=30#30>posted on > *Thu > 06 Feb 2014 06:08:18 PM PST* by Kevmo > <http://www.freerepublic.com/%7Ekevmo/> ("A person's a person, no matter > how small" ~Horton Hears a Who) > [ Post Reply <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/reply?c=30>| > Private > Reply<http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/mail-compose?refid=3114918.30;reftype=comment>| > To > 29 <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/posts?page=29#29> | View > Replies <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/replies?c=30> | Report > Abuse <http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3114918/abuse?c=30>] > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I'm growing weary of the same objections, over and over and over again on >> various internet sites. So I'm going to post each q&a here & just send >> links. >> >> >> >
