There is no limit on the strength of a magnetic field.
>From the inverse square law, how strong can a magnetic field be at one nanometer on the walls of a nano-cavity, when it is detected at 18cm to be 1.6 tesla? It is at least atomic level (10^5 tesla) or on the high end about 10^12 to 10^16 tesla. On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:19 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking deeper into the magnetic coupled positive feedback LENR reaction, > I have a few ideas to pass along. I understand that a magnetic field has > essentially unlimited access to the atomic structure. By this I mean that > a large, static external field can penetrate through the electron cloud > surrounding atoms as well as proceed directly throughout the region of the > nucleus. The same is certainly not true for an electric field since > movement of charged particles takes place to eliminate any internal field > outside the atoms themselves. > > This freedom of magnetic field movement enables coupling to exist among > electrons and protons that make up the atomic structures of all connected, > and particularly nearby, atoms. i suspect that any magnetic coupling path > which transports a significant quantity of energy away from a reaction site > would exhibit rapid variations in its magnitude and direction. This rapid > flux change would likely be attenuated as it passes through the conductive > metal lattice and tends to limit the distance of the effective coupling. > The expected attenuation is proportional to the rate of fluxuation. > > Another interesting feature of the magnetic field behavior is that nickel > has magnetic domains that modify the local field pattern within the metal > at low to moderate temperatures. At above the Curie temperature(355C) this > effect goes away and that also happens to be in the range of temperatures > at which LENR activity begins to become important. This may be a > coincidence, but I suspect not. > > I believe that a positive feedback mechanism is in play because of the > large magnitude of the measured external magnetic field reported by DGT. > Any random process that results in charge movement must tend to cancel out > the field when integrated over a significant volume of material. So, if > the magnetic coupling among the active sites enhances the reaction rate and > those induced reactions increase the initial field in phase, then both > build to a large level as I have mentioned previously. > > A characteristic of this type of system would be for it to exhibit a > threshold effect. Until adequate coupling between sites exists, very > little LENR activity would be expected to occur. Too few of what we > typically refer to as NAE and you only see weak nuclear activity. Perhaps > the normal magnetic domains of moderate temperature nickel disrupt the > process which again might attenuate the coupling. Impurities within the > metal could be a factor to contend with in some instances. The list of > problems which prevent the positive feedback from reaching the required > threshold may be extensive and has done a significant job of obscuring LENR. > > DGT apparently has discovered the recipe that enables the magnetic > coupling to occur. The same likely is true of Rossi, although he has not > publicly described any magnetic field effects except in coded terms. The > recent revelation that P&F used a large external magnetic field supports > the present concept. If their system had adequate natural internal > magnetic coupling and the associated feedback, then the external field may > not have been necessary. > > Is anyone aware of how a strong magnetic field from an external source > effects the structure of atoms? Do the electrons adjust their orbits in > such a manner as to eliminate the external field that extends into the > nucleus in a manner similar to the behavior of a super conductor? This is > important to understand if we are to determine how the nearby nuclei couple > via the field. Also, movement of the charges associated with the metal > atoms as well as the hydrogen might reveal the hidden mechanism responsible > for the fusion. The exact cause is still lacking explanation. > > The question remains as to how a strong guiding magnetic field can enhance > a fusion reaction that then makes a significant contribution to the driving > field. Axil has one general proposal to consider, but there may be a more > specific one. > > Dave >
