Very simply, the huge magnetic fields is a result of packing EMF tightly into a very confined relative volume thereby squeezing the EMF in position and increasing its momentum.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>wrote: > Bob, > > As far as I know, there is no external magnetic field applied to the > reactor > by means of coils. Anyway, the H field might become from the lattice > itself? > Rossi and DGT have said to measure huge magnetic field near the reactor. > Always difficult to know what is the cause and what is the result of an > unknown black box. > > Arnaud > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] > Sent: mardi 18 février 2014 22:04 > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: [Vo]:Re: The Rossi effect as an Inverted Mossbauer Effect > Importance: High > > Amaud and Jones-- > > Keep in mind that at least for magnetic coupling--spin/angular momentum and > its associated energy-- it is possible to modify resonant energy levels of > the QM system by changing the magnitude of the static H field. Transitions > between J spin states can be created to match the necessary energy to make > a > > nuclear transition probable. > > Bob Cook > > -----Original Message----- > From: Arnaud Kodeck > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:56 AM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: The Rossi effect as an Inverted Mossbauer Effect > > Ni61 is the only odd isotope of Ni and count only for 1% of the natural > Nickel. It will be huge cost to "enrich" the Ni61. > > Ni61 + p => Cu62 which is beta+ emitter which would be easy detected in > positron/electron annihilation. I don't think this is the reaction which > happends inside Rossi's reactor. > > The debye temperature is around 180°C for the nickel. Above this > temperature, phonon can move freely in the lattice at the speed of > sound. Axil always keeps speaking of coupling phonon/photon (polariton) > at same resonant frequency could make the lattice to oscillate. If > excitation frequency (photon) matches the resonant frequency of the > lattice (phonon), wouldn't be like an invertedmossbauer effect? > > Just thoughts ... > > > > On 2014-02-18 15:53, Jones Beene wrote: > > From: Arnaud Kodeck > > > > From DGT, we know that the nickel needs to be above the debye > > temperature for the Rossi effect to take place. Vibration in the lattice > > is > > a key element. The Mossbauer effect could be the excitation needed for > the > > vibration in the lattice to take place. > > > > Jones, can you explain what do you mean by Mossbauer isotope? > > > > Arnaud, > > > > First, off - I am not an expert in NMR and that is why I have been > > quizzing > > Bob Cook about a subject that came up as far back as 1990 - in an effort > > to > > explain the excess energy of LENR - and the lack of detectability of > gamma > > radiation. > > > > Generally speaking, an isotope - usually with odd numbered amu such as > > iron-57 or nickel-61, can permit a limited kind of "photon chain > reaction" > > of moderate energy photons due to a loss-free (recoilless) > > absorption/emission nuclear property, and this would be especially true > > within an "exciton" of the host metal. > > > > I'm guessing that since the role of 57Fe is well-known in spectroscopy, > > you > > are really asking how a corresponding nickel isotope nickel participates > > in > > a similar reaction, where we are interested in bulk energy effects and > not > > subtle physical effects which are illuminated by the coherence. > > > > That bulk effect, if it exists - would be the "inverted" reaction. Of > > course, the reaction must involve photons below the detection limit - > > since > > no gamma is detected. It would also probably need to involve infrared > > coherence, and the idea is that in an inverted reaction there can be > > frequency upshifting so two widely separated spectra are locked in phase. > > > > In nickel at 350 degrees C, the nuclei will be moving chaotically due to > > thermal motion, but not as chaotically if there is IR coherence > > (superradiance) at near 10 THz. This part has actually been detected by > > NASA > > but not the rest of the hypothesis. A moderate energy photon, of the > > Mossbauer type - but below the detection limit of about 4 keV interacts > > with, or is emitted by a nucleus which has a spread of vibrational > values, > > and there is a the Doppler effect. This photon can be called a gamma ray, > > since it is of nuclear origin, but because the energy level must be low > to > > avoid detection - the terminology is x-ray. This is all hypothetical of > > course. > > > > Problem is: and may you realize this - the known value for nickel-61 of a > > resonant photon is 67.4 keV which would have been detected in the Rossi > > experiment. Therefore either there is either a second active Mossbauer > > isotope, or a lower level resonance, below the detectability level. Of > > more > > likely - the inverted Mossbauer effect is a fiction. > > > > Anyway, to produce a resonant third signal, the two energies - the main > > x-ray photon and Doppler shifted photon need to overlap at the IR > > resonance > > (this signal will be in the range of FIR - far infrared at about 5-30 > > THz). > > Thus a putative inverted system would be in limited photon/phonon > > coherence > > and possess a limited photon/phonon chain reaction capability at some > > level > > which is not detectable by normal Geiger/radiation meters. > > > > To backtrack, what Mössbauer discovered is that when the atoms are within > > a > > solid matrix the effective mass of the nucleus is very much greater. The > > recoiling mass is now effectively the mass of the whole system and if the > > photon energy is small enough the recoil of the nucleus is too low to be > > transmitted as a phonon and so the whole system recoils as if it were > > coherent and it can be actually coherent in the IR range if the blackbody > > peak is narrowed. > > > > In the inverted version, presumably the resonance will allow FIR energy > to > > resonate as if the whole system were coherent and this will be upshifted > > to > > a level felt by the nucleus (low keV). However, to my thinking this does > > not > > work at 67.4 keV so the whole theory falls apart. > > > > As you will notice, this suggestion has not been well-vetted - even after > > 24 > > years, so take it for what it's worth. > > > > Jones > > -- > Arnaud Kodeck > LAKOCO Sprl > >
