http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Matters-Lot-Annotated-Experiment-ebook/dp/B00HZ05VIE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1390339797&sr=1-1
It is basically the first 6 months of my blog (darkmattersalot.com) adapted to an Ebook. It is a chemical engineer's hunt for dark/vacuum energy in our atmosphere using basic thermodynamics, string/M theory and the National Weather Service... I am modeling the Sun and Earth as two "branes" of vacuum(6-D torroids) with strings and particles of vacuum stringing and streaming between them in the solar wind I started tracking low pressure systems off the equatorial jet and polar jets in 2012 and modeling them as if they were strings of vacuum, triggering hurricanes(entangled strings), waterspouts, sinkholes/seismic(ionizing/decay where strings are entering the Earth) and ionizing our atmosphere as they decay in our jet streams triggering electromagnetic effects. These mesovortexes and supercells that break off the jet streams are basically "topological defects" of the "cosmic" strings of vacuum that break off and decay and trigger our storms, which is really the inflation phase of our quantum gravity field from the solar wind. I have two more books coming out, one will be the next 6 months of the blog. The other book is focused on Doppler Microwave radars, which I think, based upon 6 months of study, including statistics, are triggering an increase in vacuum upsets around the radars, including an increase in sinkholes, shallow seismic events, mesovortex events, hypoxia/algae blooms in waters (through ionization and oxidation). If you take what Axil, Jones, Fran and others have been talking about at the atomic level and scale the vacuum energy up to the "cosmic level", it sort of follows along. I am working with two professional researchers now and feeding them my data around the towers to see if they get the same results with some other biological data. In 1956 Doppler radars were taken from the military and used for weather forecasting. Although they do a lot of good, I think they are also damaging biology. I have had a lot of fun developing a theory and piecing it all together in whatever direction it takes me. As I have looked closely at doppler radars, I have been recently looking at all of the cruise ship illnesses with norovirus. I am looking at those large cruise ships and they have people partying on elevated decks directly beside and between multiple 20,000-30,000 watt pulsed Doppler microwave radars inside the large radomes. I think those radars may be triggering the illness outbreaks. If you are going on a cruise, I would advise not hanging out too close to them. My partner was a military pilot on an aircraft carrier and they NEVER walked close to operating radars. http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/02/26/does-this-seem-remotely-safe-to-anybody/ I have all sorts of scientific data I found from the 1990's on concerns with Doppler radars causing cancer and related disease. Norovirus is basically strands of RNA, I think the microwave radars, along with the increased vacuum, may be creating it FROM HUMANS. You and Terry are electrical engineers, do you guys think that is a good idea to put your head beside a 30,000 watt pulsed microwave radar while drinking a Pina Colada?? Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:08 PM, <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote: > What book did you write? > > > I sold 3 books in February, but I found out one sale was my wife, does > that count? > > I think more people are interested in watching Justin Beiber pee in a > trash can. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Feb 28, 2014 2:33 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Plastic detector find > > Frank, > > I sold 3 books in February, but I found out one sale was my wife, does > that count? > > I think more people are interested in watching Justin Beiber pee in a > trash can. > > > On Friday, February 28, 2014, <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Alan. >> >> I really still have a lot to learn. Its fun! Industrial products >> are the way >> to go. >> >> Today I'm going to turn over my #1 detector over to the dump owner. #5 >> false signals should not be a problem since there are no #5 bottles. We >> shall see how it goes in actual operation. If it works OK we will have our >> first product. I will video the operation. I hope it is not a fiasco. >> Next going to try my luck at #2 plastic detection. #2 is transparent at >> terahertz frequencies. I already have the PIR (passive infrared) detector. >> I am going to try one of those etched plate Edmond Scientific visible >> spectrum analyzers as a cheep infrared polarizer. >> >> heat source----> etched plate---> #2 plastic----->etched plate 90 deg >> ---> PIR detector >> >> We shall see what happens. Maybe I will learn more and advance by two >> steps. >> So far the costs have been low and Its been a learning experience. >> >> Sold 14 books in Feb. That produced revenue of $2 per day. My cat >> could live on it. >> Thank God I had a regular job for 32 years. This starting a business is >> difficult. >> >> Frank >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: AlanG <a...@magicsound.us> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Fri, Feb 28, 2014 1:45 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Plastic detector find >> >> >> On 2/28/2014 6:09 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: >> >> Thank you Alan G. >> >> How? I really want to do this. >> >> >> I would start with a process-control camera module, maybe 320x240 pixels. >> You shouldn't need more resolution, and keeping the pixel count small means >> you won't need a fancy image processing chip. Such modules typically use >> the common I2C or similar serial control and data interface, and some >> modules will have an on-board micro controller. If I were doing this >> project, I'd write some firmware that would look at the change in color >> information between adjacent pixels and the do some simple statistical >> analysis on the result. The goal is to generate a single value for each >> image that represents how many colors are contained in the image. Then all >> you need is a threshold value above which the #5 plastic is detected. Other >> thresholds based on luminance might be capable of sorting out the other >> types so that a single detector could do the whole thing. >> >> AlanG >> >
