On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, it’s not opinion when 100% of the available proof is on your side. > That's a pretty strong assessment of the merits of your position. :) > It is fact that LENR is not and cannot be a known fusion reaction, since > it is fact that no known nuclear fusion reaction is gamma free. QED. ... By > definition, cold fusion cannot be the same known reaction as deuterium > fusion to helium, which was known prior to 1989 - if it is gammaless – > unless and until it can be shown that there is a real physical mechanism > for not only for suppressing gammas, but for suppressing 100% of them > without exception. > Does either of these statements contradict anything I've said or assumed? I hope my outlining of my assumptions demonstrates that I do not have the typical fusion branches in mind. I have the general notion of two nucleons combining to create a larger nucleon with less mass and a release of energy. The branches would need to be different. Eric
