The behavior of two balls can not be applied to LENR. Imagining how photons might interact ignores the fact that the protons are not isolated in space when in a chemical lattice. When LENR occurs in a lattice, all the protons, deuterons and electrons are innerconnected. They all are restrained in their motion by forces that hold the lattice together.
People who have the mind of the physicist seem to ignore what actually happens in a chemical structure. This structure is not plasma as is experienced in hot fusion. The atoms in such a structure are not free to move except under well known restraint. The amount of energy available is limited by the energy holding the structure together, which is no more than a few eV. Pretending otherwise has made the present theories worthless. If you are a physicist and want to explain LENR, please first learn some chemistry. Ed Storms On Mar 21, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Bob Cook wrote: > Harry and Jones-- > > I have not said anything about these balls--Jones has said it all. They > demonstrate the instantaneous change of kinetic energy, angular momentum and > linear momentum into spin--rotational energy alone. However, if the > potential energy of the welded bond or the magnetic field goes away, the spin > energy would transform back into kinetic energy of the two balls. They would > fly apart with the same kinetic energy (or nearly as much less friction loss) > that they had when they first met. (Kind of like getting married and then > divorced.) > > LENR is nice since the system starts out with high spin energy and only > increases its potential energy (remaining married) with no destructive > kinetic energy to speak of--only well managed heat. > > Bob > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jones Beene > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:47 AM > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Hurricane balls, RAR and high-Q factor > > From: H Veeder > > …two steel ball bearings welded together … are a metaphorical cooper-pair, so > to speak... raising another weird question: is there something about > spherical-pairing alone, which is special - at any level? > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvq8laPb498 > > Nice…. two magnetic balls roll together and their linear motion is converted > into rotational motion. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIfTKBVI6ZQ > > Thank, Harry - this video is another good visual example of a larger > phenomenon involving pairing - since we can better visualize how linear > motion is converted to rotational naturally. This is somewhat along the lines > of how Bob Cook wants to fashion the LENR reaction, with the conversion of > kinetic energy of reactants being spin-coupled, in the end. > > However, IMO - this process does not require actual fusion to be anomalously > energetic. And coupling would never hide gamma rays, if there was a nuclear > reaction, so essentially coupling cannot be related to permanent fusion, > since the energies are too high. > > However, moderate excess energy – well above chemical but less than nuclear, > requires only the same basic force which keeps electrons from interacting > with protons to begin with. That force is the zero point field. Puthoff and > associates have elegantly framed the details of this kind of energy transfer, > but until recently, there was doubt that ZPE could be easily converted to > energy at a macro scale. > > The armchair theorist can imagine that the two balls are protons at a > distance, and when they are accelerated together, say during the collapse of > molecule of H2 due to electron degeneracy, Pauli exclusion keeps the two from > fusing, and yet their linear motion is converted to spin. Extraordinary spin > such as is the visual effect of the videos. > > In fact, just prior to this happening with protons, the two electrons of H2 > could have joined into a temporary cooper pair of electrons, which function > to accelerate the electrons towards each other. Thus one cooper-pair starts > the LENR reaction and another finishes it, but no permanent fusion takes > place. The transient electron pairing only needs to happen for a femtosecond > to set the stage for this form of LENR). > > This model serves to explain, to an large extent, why Ni-H LENR can be so > robust with no permanent nuclear reaction at all – since all of the resultant > high spin is coupled back to magnons – which are easier to couple within a > ferromagnetic lattice than within an exciton. When the exciton is > ferromagnetic itself, the reaction is boosted and ZPE is converted to thermal > energy. > > Jones > > One further point about “pairing of spheres” being special or natural or > favored at many levels of geometry. This goes beyond cooper pairs - to > cosmology. > > In our solar system, out sun is a single star, and consequently humans are > misled into thinking that most stars are singlets. > > In fact that is not true - and only about 15% of stars in our galaxy are > singlets. 85% of stars are found as binary or multiple arrangements. > > http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast122/lectures/lec10.html > > > > > > >
