On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:31 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
It seems odd that they would work toward enhancing a jet engine instead of > producing the power plant directly. Why carry the jet fuel along if you > can make sufficient power to keep the air craft in the sky for an > indefinite amount of time using LENR? Do you see an advantage to their > approach? > It is interesting to consider the following -- get LENR going in nickel and ramp the reaction up to a high temperature. Now blow hydrogen and oxygen over it. Perhaps the resulting hydrogen torch will provide some thrust. In addition, some of the hydrogen might go to feed back into the LENR reaction, and perhaps you'll also get thrust from the resulting H2O vapor. Eric
