Eric--

I think that the first step is to marry the reactor to an existing jet engine 
that could operate without the LENR boost.  Once the reliability of the LENR is 
established then the technology could evolve into a LENR only power source.  
The redundancy would be desirable from a safety standpoint.

Bob
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Eric Walker 
  To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:53 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation


  On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:31 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:


    It seems odd that they would work toward enhancing a jet engine instead of 
producing the power plant directly.  Why carry the jet fuel along if you can 
make sufficient power to keep the air craft in the sky for an indefinite amount 
of time using LENR?  Do you see an advantage to their approach?



  It is interesting to consider the following -- get LENR going in nickel and 
ramp the reaction up to a high temperature.  Now blow hydrogen and oxygen over 
it.  Perhaps the resulting hydrogen torch will provide some thrust.  In 
addition, some of the hydrogen might go to feed back into the LENR reaction, 
and perhaps you'll also get thrust from the resulting H2O vapor.


  Eric

Reply via email to