http://arxiv.org/pdf/1401.1593.pdf
*Experimental study of the two-body spin-orbit force* This field is on the cutting edge of research. On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Frank-- > > You noted: > > >>>The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin > orbit force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people.<<< > > Why is it ignored? > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* [email protected] > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:37 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier > > Thats a common mistake. We cannot reduce the Coulomb barrier. The static > force fields are conserved and cannot be reduced in a two body problem. > The static force field can, however, be bypassed by a force with longer > range. > The magnetic component of the strong nuclear force is called the spin > orbit force. It is never considered by the hot fusion people. In the solid > cold fusion environment the magnetic component can be increased by a factor > to 10 to the 39 power. Again I am not speaking of the electromagnetic > field, I am speaking of the magnetic component of the strong nuclear force. > In short "The constants of the motion tend toward the electromagnetic in a > Bose condensate that is vibrated at a dimensional frequency of 1.094 > megahertz-meters." > > Frank Z > > The Coulomb repulsion can be reduced by magnetic attraction according to > my thoughts and that would also explain magnetic interactions and low > temperature operation of LENR devices. Should we drop the reference to > Coulomb barrier and replace it with reference to an Electromagnetic Barrier? > > Dave > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Roberson <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Mar 25, 2014 11:39 am > Subject: [Vo]:Electromagnetic Barrier > > We hear so much chatter about the Coulomb barrier and how difficult it > is to overcome for fusion events to occur. Perhaps we should consider it > as an electromagnetic barrier instead. There is plenty of reason to > suspect that a magnetic component of force is active along with the > electric component. > > Some in this list believe that spin coupling has a large impact upon the > rate of LENR activity and there may well be other magnetic interactions > associated with nano particles and their large local magnetic fields. I > tend to think that these couplings are a key concept that needs to be > understood in detail if an ultimate theory is to be developed. > > The Coulomb repulsion can be reduced by magnetic attraction according to > my thoughts and that would also explain magnetic interactions and low > temperature operation of LENR devices. Should we drop the reference to > Coulomb barrier and replace it with reference to an Electromagnetic Barrier? > > Dave > >
