Axil, I am sure your statements has merit. I am not able to determine how accurate you are. I do know that it requires that one utilise old experience and new found techniques and all other resources to reach the final stage. The fully developed LENR reactor in your garage might be good for you but to be called a success it requires all the other ingredients also. I do not want you to change your opinion just be open to others. If this product holds what it promises. It is to late for anyone to keep it away from a commercialization. For all of us depending on the US government it would be beneficial if the US participated and did not let the opportunity to be a dominant factor. Judging from the cellphone development it might happen. US was at least five years behind deploying that technology. I do not speculate why. First to market will not mean much from economical or impact point of view. A good concept with enough backing of capital, management and marketing will be key-factors once the technical issues are understood - parallel with optimal engineering.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > *I am sure they have great merits but they require to be tied to 'old' > knowledge and experience * > > To my way of thinking, *neutrons* play no part in LENR in any of its > manifestations. Nuclear physics is predicated on the neutron as a central > causative factor. Even the nuclear reactions researched in nuclear physics > do not apply to LENR multiple nuclei cluster fusion reactions. Nuclear > physics will be out of work after LENR is introduced and they all need to > be retrained. This will be difficult because as the twig is bent, so the > tree shall grow. > > If chemistry is judged to cover super atoms, and Nano-particle production, > together with nanoplasmonics, metallurgy, and hydrogen chemistry, then > chemistry is important in that regard. > > > *Together with Europe we have the best infrastructure to deploy LENR.* > > Europe is energy poor and their need for energy and LENR is great. The US > is rich in energy and will resist LENR, just as Russia will ,and Iran, and > OPEC. > > The US will use LENR for weapons and keep it classified. This might change > if DGT releases their product due to public pressure in the US to compete > in the commercial energy marketplace. > > I predict that DGT will be first to market because of military medaling in > the US LENR situation. > >> >> >
