Thank You Harry, I think that is a good idea. It does not eliminate the need to have an organization around an idea and a team with a purpose.
However, It makes an environment, which will help. It is a step in the direction I propose. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:55 PM, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennart and others interested in the commercial side of CF should watch > this (if you haven't already). > > Steve Katinski and David Nagel are setting up an industry association for > advancing science and business in LANR Cold Fusion > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMNSl-nrFXQ&list=UUH78efhknLR-cuL9w2hVcUQ > > Harry > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Lennart Thornros > <lenn...@thornros.com>wrote: > >> Axil, >> No I have not read those articles. A brief look told me that I have had >> some of the information in other forums. I will look through the entire set >> of documents later this week. >> I appreciate the articles, they certainly have value. In addition the >> articles will improve my knowledge - so Thank You. >> I appreciate your dedication to the issue. >> My point is that we need more than one philosophy in order to sort out >> how LENR will be explained. You are actually using old time knowledge to >> support your theory and I think that is required. Tesla had his moments but >> he also managed to leave a lot of holes in the documentation I think. Do >> not blame the government. Tesla could have secured that information found >> its way to 'the people'. Papp, Moray et al. they are either very smart but >> useless in leaving behind a theory documented so later generations could >> benefit or they were scam artists. I do not know and I am not accusing >> either one. However, there are mystical stories involved and that would not >> need to be. It has been relatively easy to communicate since Gutenberg. >> There is a say what is poorly communicated is based on a weak thought. I >> think many of the people referred to failed in communication and there is >> no excuse for that. Was it because of a illogical idea ? >> As we talk about the deployment one need to engage other disciplines >> also. I am not looking for a job as I am too old to engage in a venture of >> this magnitude. However, people with entrepreneurial skills and >> understanding of marketing and finance are key to get deployment. If you >> think that will be automatic as the physical scientists find the answer you >> have to stop and think again. Mr. Tesla is a good example. I know that many >> people say that he was misunderstood and that J.P. Morgan is accused of >> stopping his ideas as he saw no way to profit from his endless free >> electricity. If it was so, then Tesla's mistake was to not seek support >> from people with the financial knowledge. You can blame JPM but he looked >> after his interest - good or bad - Tesla failed because he concentrated on >> the thing he knew. He did not fail because JPM did not do what Tesla >> thought right. There is a need to take responsibility for one's own >> mistakes. >> Keep up looking for the answer but listen to others and engage >> specialists when need be and not too late is my advice. >> >> Best Regards , >> Lennart Thornros >> >> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >> lenn...@thornros.com >> +1 916 436 1899 >> 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 >> >> "Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort." PJM >> >> >>>
