Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
> And Jed is lying about the negative results. It's just that. > I may be mistaken, but I am not lying. You should not toss around words such as "lying" in this forum. You mean that you disagree with me. Fair enough. A disagreement is not a lie. I think the ball is in your court. If there are positive results, where are they? When and where were they published? I have not seen any papers from Defkalion. Maybe I missed one. Perhaps you think the video was positive. I agree with Hadjichristos that the flow rate problems make this demonstration invalid. Perhaps you have spoken with someone who visited Defkalion and was impressed. I have not. Perhaps you thought the published photos of the calorimeter and the used glow plugs were impressive. I did not think so. The calorimeter looked crude, completely unlike the calorimeters Defkalion told me they had. As far as I know, the reactor has only run for short periods before the glow plugs burned out. Not long enough to prove the point. - Jed
