Axil-- Why do you say a SPP is a wave--I think of it as a particle--like you say a BOSON. Are BOSONs also unlimited in their loquaciousness as well as strength?
Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:55 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention The Surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) is a hybrid infrared/electron combo wave. It has spin and most important ...IT IS A BOSON.. BOSON means unlimited strength. That wave based spin produces the anapole magnetic field when the SPP forms a soliton in a vortex. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: Axil Axil-- You finally have seen the light--the EMF that is. I joined this Blog a little over 2 months ago with a bias that spin and magnetism are the keys to LENR. I have been exposed to a lot of ideas and some facts. I am even more biased now. Spin is an energy with a direction and can be controlled by a magnetic field. The magnetic field establishes the amount of energy (via spin) a particle can hold and the differential amounts it can give up or take up. The old timers thought the energy was akin to a spinning top's energy and angular momentum. I am beginning to think of it as a mini Vortex of a magnetic field more or less locally confined within a volume of space--the particle boundary. Clarifying what is happening is just a matter of thinking inside the boundary. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mats Lewan book : An Impossible Invention Based on the time honored LENR causation concept of charge screening, LENR is posited to be an EMF process. Since charge is emergent from spin, and spin is the origin on magnetism. therefore. LENR is a magnetic based process at its root. On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: Ahern seems to believe magnetic effects are at the heart of LENR phenomena. Each experimentalist and theorist has a pet theory about what is going on. What is important is whether one is able to subjugate one's personal hunches to a more objective and systematic pursuit of what is going on. He does not think nuclear reactions are involved. This should be a warning sign that Dr. Ahern might not be seeing much of interest. What seems clear is that some researchers get very pronounced results. Eric
