http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C5Xbi-VJkFA
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree high voltage or magnetic field is part of it like Tesla’s effort > to solidify the ether but IMHO it will take 2 independent fields > interacting with a carrier of some sort – hydrogen or photons – to give ZPE > a path into our dimension. I suspect the fields will individually segregate > the vacuum slightly but without a Maxwellian system to exploit the > segregation it will cancel out, a second field provides this potential thru > simple alignment of these segregated fields like gravitational lensing > provides a path for photons to be amplified I think similar can be achieved > with vacuum, really far out on a limb even suspect UFO’s could be visible > effects of this alignment of segregated vacuum forming lenses along a > dilated dimensional path that peers into the future.. not an energy scheme > but still I suspect all these anomalies of ufo, levitation and zero point > energy are related to anomalies in vacuum pressure in the same way we > accept time dilation thru luminal acceleration. I don’t think it was a > coincidence that Naudts paper on relativistic hydrogen was based on the > hydrino loaded into a stationary skeletal catalyst in a lab in NJ… there > isn’t any near luminal displacement or event horizions occurring in NJ so > what was he trying to say? > > Fran > > > > > > *From:* MarkI-Zeropoint > [mailto:[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] > > *Sent:* Monday, April 28, 2014 7:51 PM > *To:* [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea? > > > > That's easy! > > ;-) > > > > Reduce the turbulence in the stream, which for the Dirac Sea, means using > an intense electric or magnetic field to polarize the vacuum... > > > > -mark iverson > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > > > Taking all of this together, there seems to exist a prima facie case for > this premise: > > > > 1) Dark matter is inherent in the quantum vacuum, meaning it is an > illusion in 3-space except for gravitational effects > > 2) The quantum vacuum = Dirac sea = dark matter > > 3) CMB is not a relic of a Big Bang but is residual radiation from > the Dirac sea > > > > Now comes the interesting part. Can this information, if valid, be put to > use in alternative energy? > > > > One seemingly obvious way to proceed is to consider CMB as a “leak” of > some kind. If it is a leak, then we want to increase the flow rate. > > > > There are many ways to increase the flow rate of various streams, some of > which are applicable to microwave photons … so let the games begin… > > > > *From: *ChemE Stewart > > > > http://m.phys.org/news/2011-08-dark-illusion-quantum-vacuum.html > > *From: *David Roberson > > A thought just came to me while considering alternate explanations for the > CMB. Dark matter is assumed to be distributed throughout the universe and > is supposed to clump together around galaxy centers and other large massive > objects. I have long >
