I agree it is isotropic in freespace above the plank scale but IMHO it can vary at other than the normal gravitational square law thru suppression when conductive geometries segregate the density of vacuum wavelengths into regions larger than the plank scale which we associate with London forces, van der Walls and Casimir force. I also suspect large magnetic and voltaic fields can affect this density in conjunction with other fields or quantum effects of geometry. I am convinced that “suppressed region” of a Casimir cavity represents a segregation of shorter wavelengths in the cavity that are fed by a larger region of slightly stretched wavelengths that exactly balance out to the isotropic value we experience at the macro scale but unlike the tiny wormholes in the chaotic foam beneath the Plank scale these breaches in isotropy are large enough for physical matter to interact with in opposition to the normal square law..I posit it is these 2 competing forces where the isotropy is broken that allows the caveat of COE regarding gas law to be suspended, allowing for regions of altered space large enough to interact with moving gas atoms makes a Maxwellian demon possible. In an isotropic environment random motion of gas can not be harnessed but when you have a tapestry of different vacuum densities formed by a rigid catalyst or nano powders this random motion of gas becomes biased. I believe the ionic and molecular forms of gas oppose the random motion between different regions while atomic gas is able to change into the new fractional values or DDL unopposed.
Fran From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 5:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is the CMB leakage from Dirac's Sea? Ok, cool. That is where we differ. On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: Yes, isotropic. 2014-04-29 18:44 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >: Isotropic? On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > wrote: Vacuum? What kind of vacuum? If you are talking about field theory, yes, sure, but that is "potential" energy. It can be set to 0. But, there is the vacuum for GR, the lambda. Which is small... really small... 2014-04-29 18:38 GMT-03:00 ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>: Do you think we have vacuum in our atmosphere ? If yes, do think it is smooth and isotopic ? On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: Ok, I misinterpreted you, I thought you said he thought it was good enough On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: Yes, I read that, but I don't agree with him. It's not convincing because he is used to a great precision, but I, that I am not used to that, think it is good enough. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected] -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected] -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
