Jones-- I had the same impressions in listening to the interview. It sounds like Sterling and Mike were trying to promote an interest that was unfounded, especially since they glossed over obvious questions.
Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Jones Beene To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 9:18 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:Oxygen to hydrogen? From: Steve High Yes, look at how little oxygen is present in the exhaust gas, verified by a "reputable" testing company. I'm assuming that this ain't hydrolysis-wouldn't hydrolysis give you roughly one third oxygen? Listen to the interview if you have the time. The inventor appears to be blithely suggesting that there is wholesale conversion of oxygen to hydrogen taking place in there. Huh what? It gets worse, the closer one looks, or should I say "more humorous". This is science by PR release and hucksterism . not that MIT does not do the same thing, on occasion. In fact some of MIT's more notorious escapades - which are the many overhyped but failed hydrogen inventions of Prof. Dan Nocera, are but a slight improvement. At least Nocera is arguably honest, at some base level, but in the case of SHT, there is doubt about true intentions. In both case$ the goal is the $ame. I happened to be in the vicinity of Solar Hydrogen's Menlo Park address the other day (it is next door to SRI) so I stopped in to have a look. It turns out that they actually have no corporate office nor lab at all ! . bizarre - the address listed on all of their PR releases is that of a Law Office. and one that would not acknowledge at first that SHT is even a client ! Aggressively promoting this kind of "energy miracle" crap makes everyone in alternative-energy look bad (even more so when they blindly accept it). But then again, with Nocera/MIT as your model, this kind of science by PR release is becoming standard operating procedure.
