I have been waiting and seeing, but with the advent of a third party test, I thought it was time to get additional information from the experts here on vortex.
I had heard about this company a few months ago. I was copied on this message from Michael Mc Kubre over a month ago. I have not heard if the visit can off, or if it did what MM’s evaluation of it was. If you can find out, let me know. *From: Michael Mc Kubre [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 3:10 PM To: Jim Dunn Subject: Re: possible 'breakthru' in Hydrogen production by Menlo Park research group ?* *Hi Jim * *Yes, you are not the first to forward this (maybe the Menlo Park context?). I am traveling ATM and this seemed so ridiculous that I did not follow up. When I return I will pulse them and see if they will accept a visit. It will either be entertaining or revolutionary. Just looking at the mass numbers these guys are either claiming to create mass (H), or turn O into H, with very little energy cost. About the only two laws I absolutely trust are the first law of thermodynamics and Einstein’s equivalence of mass an energy. One is violated here. I hope all is well with you.* *Best,* *m* Like the deuterium to hydrogen experiment we talked about recently and the associated extraction of energy from the vacuum, just because it seems impossible, it does not mean it cannot happen. On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Axil Axil > > > > Here is more info from Revolution Green web site. "Konstantine > Balakiryan, PhD, is a founder and CEO at Solar Hydrogen Trends Inc. As a > chief scientist he is the driving force behind the 7 models of the hydrogen > reactor. Konstantine was a Professor and head of physics, chemistry and > mathematics department at the Russian University of Friendship (Moscow). > > > > Funny thing, Axil. Most PhD’s have a few relevant publications, especially > in an advanced technology if they are promoting that technology and trying > to raise tens of millions. Or at least a Patent or two. Are there any > patents or publications for Balakiryan? I’ve been unable to find them if > they are out there. > > > > However – look at the picture of the impressive “reactor” which appears on > the SHT website: http://www.solarhydrogentrends.com/img/laboratory.jpg > > Indeed, one would need something like this to handle 16 different chemical > reactions, as they claim? OTOH, doesn’t that pic look remarkably like this > bottling machine from China: > http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-166130981/stock-photo-drinks-production-plant-in-china.html > > > > Coincidence? Maybe the same company designed both? > > > > In the case of Balakiryan, a quick googling turns up zero publications, > no discussion on Physics boards, and no patents … yet a number of telling > comments like this one: > > Dear Kourtney, > > I have an idea for a new line of jeans named ”Salvador Dali” by Kourtney > Kardashian. This innovative concept will astonish the fashion world. Please > call me, so I can send you some of the designs. > > 602 618 4222. > Konstantin Balakiryan > PhD, Professor > > Yes, this is/was indeed the Telephone # of a person named “Dr Konstantin > Balakiryan,” but maybe it is his son, who is also a young professor ? - > instead of the genius who is now CEO of Solar Hydrogen Trends. > > > > All of this is circumstantial and means nothing really, if KB is really a > top scientist, and if there is truth to these claims. > > > > Yet since SHT are actively seeking money which could go into honest > alternative energy R&D, should the commentators on Vortex not question > whether or not he is a real scientist or a con artist instead? Of course, > maybe he is just interested in getting into Kourtney’s jeans at the same > time as he is saving the World by converting oxygen into hydrogen J > > > > The point being – it is probably wise for vocal proponents of LENR to > “wait and see” if there really is any small shred of evidence for these > incredible claims - besides that of a SoCal smog tester dude who does not > want to talk about the SHT testing on the record. > > > > >
