In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 3 May 2014 12:13:28 -0400: Hi, [snip] >*Robin van Spaandonk is right when he says that the amount of energy >required to produce the oxygen to hydrogen separation is inconceivable in >its magnitude. Because the amount of oxygen produced is substantial, the >energy to break up that much oxygen into hydrogen would be in the hundreds >of gigawatts of energy output, the energy production capacity of a few >hundred nuclear reactors, or the energy produced by a good sized nuclear >device.* > > > >*This transmutation of oxygen into hydrogen is endothermic. Where is all >that energy coming from? *
BTW a couple small side notes: 1) If you add a small Hydrinohydride ion to an Oxygen atom, it might take up a close orbit around the Oxygen nucleus, effectively reducing the charge of the Oxygen by one, and making it appear chemically to be Nitrogen (but with a mass of 17 rather than 14). 2) Both Ar+ & O++ are Mills catalysts. If Ar were deliberately added to the mix then both species of ion might be present in a sono-luminescence bubble, created by the ultra-sound. I suspect strongly that this crowd is hanging onto Mills' coat tails, and providing a nonsense explanation for the operation of their device to cover the fact. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
