From: James Bowery 

 

Just got off the phone with the author and he doesn't see any indication Tesla 
was onto the vector potential -- which Maxwell called "electrokinetic momentum".

 

BTW:  He says Maxwell made no bones about the physical reality of 
electrokinetic momentum -- he was quite clear it was physical.

 

There could be some confusion in semantics or terminology, but it is 
short-sighted to overlook Tesla’s contribution to this field in terms of 
practical application of a similar phenomenon – which is capturing the energy 
of wireless transmission (of some type of energy) in a way that seems to avoid 
inverse-square diminution. 

 

This identical phenomenon could also be at the basis of the Sweet/Manelas 
device as tested by Brian Ahern. The device was invented by Floyd Sweet and 
built by Arthur Manelas.

 

Brian put up some relevant slides on this site which documents the energy 
anomaly discovered with the Manelas devices. Please invite Zimmerman to have a 
look.

http://e-catsite.com/manelas-device/

 

What makes me think this is related to a Zimmerman type of receiver is that 

1)    The “load” is also a plasma “antenna” of a sort (CFL lamps)

2)    the device must be battery powered in order to receive this kind of 
energy but the batteries do not discharge. They actually appears to be part of 
the receiving structure

3)    there is a Doppler radar nearby in Manchester NH (not certain of the 
exact distance away, maybe Stewart knows)

4)    the ferrite billet corresponds well in dimensions to a harmonic 
wavelength of GHz in the range of 1-2 GHz.

 

Another detail of note – the device cools down below ambient during operation, 
despite being powered by a fairly high current.

 

In the context of Stewart’s Doppler radar disclosures, one would think the 
Zimmerman type of vector wave collection device would have practical 
application to tap into this as a source of power; and as it turns out – this 
device could inadvertently be doing just that.

 

Jones

 

 

Reply via email to