ChemE,

You need to research these systems.  Each transmitter is far lower than the 
powers you list and they are not correlated in time or frequency.   From what I 
recall the dangers associated with this type of radiation has never been shown 
to be significant.


Dave

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 11:17 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio


David,


It is not heating.  It is the electromagnetic discharge of the instantaneous 
pulses of microwave radiation. 


Cell towers are typically 20,000 to 50,000 watts.  Read this letter


http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf




Radiation Impacts and Categorical Exclusions

"There is a growing level of anecdotal evidence linking effects of non-thermal, 
non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation from communication towers on nesting and 
roosting wild birds and other wildlife in the U.S. Independent, third-party 
studies have yet to be conducted in the U.S. or Canada, although a 
peer-reviewed research protocol developed for the U.S. Forest Service by the 
Service's Division of Migratory Bird Management is available to study both 
collision and radiation impacts (Manville 2002). As previously mentioned, 
Balmori (2005) found strong negative correlations between levels of 
tower-emitted microwave radiation and bird breeding, nesting, and roosting in 
the vicinity of electromagnetic fields in Spain. He documented nest and site 
abandonment, plumage deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship, 
and death in House Sparrows, White Storks, Rock Doves, Magpies, Collared Doves, 
and other species. Though these species had historically been documented to 
roost and nest in these areas, Balmori (2005) did not observe these symptoms 
prior to construction and operation of the cellular phone towers. Balmori and 
Hallberg (2007) and Everaert and Bauwens (2007) found similar strong negative 
correlations among male House Sparrows. Under laboratory 'conditions, DiCarlo 
et al. (2002) raised troubling concerns about impacts of low-level, non-thermal 
electromagnetic radiation from the standard 915 MHz cell phone frequency on 
domestic chicken embryos- with some lethal results (Manville 2009). Given the 
findings of the studies mentioned above, field studies should be conducted in 
North America to validate potential impacts of communication tower radiation 
both direct and indirect - to migratory birds and other trust wildlife species."





 50-100 times the normal incidence of "motor-neuron"/ALS around the Guam radar 
station



http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/04/guilefulguamguano/


The motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a group of progressive neurological 
disorders that destroy motor neurons, the cells that control essential 
voluntary muscle activity such as speaking, walking, breathing, and swallowing. 
 Normally, messages from nerve cells in the brain (called upper motor neurons) 
are transmitted to nerve cells in the brain stem and spinal cord (called lower 
motor neurons) and from them to particular muscles.  Upper motor neurons direct 
the lower motor neurons to produce movements such as walking or chewing.  Lower 
motor neurons control movement in the arms, legs, chest, face, throat, and 
tongue.  Spinal motor neurons are also called anterior horn cells.  Upper motor 
neurons are also called corticospinal neurons.
When there are disruptions in the signals between the lowest motor neurons and 
the muscle, the muscles do not work properly; the muscles gradually weaken and 
may begin wasting away and develop uncontrollable twitching 
(calledfasciculations).  When there are disruptions in the signals between the 
upper motor neurons and the lower motor neurons, the limb muscles develop 
stiffness (called spasticity), movements become slow and effortful, and tendon 
reflexes such as knee and ankle jerks become overactive.  Over time, the 
ability to control voluntary movement can be lost.












On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:57 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

Radar systems detect the target based upon the average power incident upon it.  
This is due to the continuous behavior of noise which tends to mask the signal. 
 Heating of the target becomes averaged out during the complete period of the 
base pulse which in this case is about 1 milisecond.

Of course, the reflected wave must be generated by instantaneous currents on 
the target surface as you suggest.  If the problem you are analyzing occurs 
during the 1 microsecond time frame then it is quite possible for it to be 
demonstrated.  The skin effect also comes into consideration at the high RF 
frequencies which tends to reduce penetration of the signal into the target.  
Better conductivity of the material decreases the dept rapidly.

A true Doppler radar would have the full heating effect due to the RF maximum 
power level as long as the antenna pattern illuminates the target you are 
considering.  Also, the pulsed radar pattern of the radar mentioned impacts 
upon your desired target for a small portion of the dish rotation time.   The 
average target heating must be adjusted accordingly.

I do not understand the nature of the damage that you are considering with your 
research.  If it is associated with the average heating as with a microwave 
oven then the pulse duty cycle, etc. needs to be integrated into the equations. 
 My comments earlier were directed toward clarifying the difference between a 
true Doppler radar and a more of less standard pulsed system.

Dave


 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 7:17 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio


David,  the ASR-9 is an airport survellience radar.  That is correct about the 
gain,  weather/military doppler radar gains are 45-50 dbi, more focused dishes. 
 The instantaneous pulses are > 1,000,000 watts but they are only on for 1/1000 
of each second.  Does nature average that high power pulse over 1 second like 
you are doing?  And if it does, how does nature do that?  Does it induce 
instantaneous electrical currents?  Nature operates at the speed of light, 
right?  A lot goes on in nature in 1/1000 of a second that we don't even see.




On Sunday, May 11, 2014, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed radar 
system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar.   The duty 
cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler radar is CW.  The 
average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I assume.  The gain of the 
antenna may be 34 dB relative to an isotropic radiator.

Someone might be thinking of a pulsed Doppler radar which measures the change 
in transmit frequency of the returning pulses to get target velocity 
information.  That type of radar is not a standard Doppler.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Walker <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 9:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio


Stewart,


I have glanced at your web site.  I have not taken a close look at your 
research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto something 
about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free radicals and the 
death of nearby animal and plant life.  You also have a theory of dark matter, 
and a hunch that dark matter is indirectly responsible for the conclusions 
concerning doppler radar that you arrive at in your informal research.


On the connection to dark matter, I personally have no opinion.  I am 
skeptical, however, that your research is sufficient to establish any kind of 
linkage between the effects of doppler radar and dark matter, however.  In 
light of this doubt, I think you might be able to get your investigation into 
doppler radar out to a wider audience if you did not combine it with the 
question of dark matter.  Adding dark matter into the mix asks too much of 
people in their suspension of disbelief for them to be able to give much 
credibility to your doppler radar hunch, even if both hunches ended up being 
true.


Eric





On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:55 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> wrote:



Radar/Call Sign
MHT

Model
ASR-9

Max Pulsed Power (Watts)
1,300,000

Gain (dBi)
34

Frequency (MHz)
2,800

RPM
12.5

Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km
10.39

Pulse Duration(uSec)
1.00

Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)
1,000

Range Est. (Miles)
60

Latitude
42.937248

Longitude
-71.437286

FIPS
33011

County
Hillsborough

State
NH















Reply via email to