David, I have been researching these radars for approx. 1 year and diseased biology for 1 1/2 years.
When you converted that instantaneous high power pulse to a one second average you are basically confusing power with energy, which is WRONG. If it was correct then why not operate your radar continuously at an average power of 1500 watts? BECAUSE THEY WON'T work. As far as I can tell you have done very little research. If you really want to do some and not just talk like a radio guy, I suggest you read the following and the referenced research papers, many peer reviewed. This: http://www.scopemed.org/?jft=65&ft=65-1394615302#abstract And This: http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/05/03/power-to-the-people/ http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/13/autism-emf/ And this: http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/03/13/its-the-same-frequency-range-why-would-you-expect-the-results-to-be-different/ And this: http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/01/12/florida-2/ And this: http://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/11-4-13-florida1.png And this: http://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fish-kills-statistics.png And this: http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/03/05/quick-everybody-rush-to-florida/ And This: http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/24/a-shocking-discovery/ And also look at the 300 hundred or so epidemiology maps I have placed on my blog and the 900 posts over the past two years and then get back to me OK?? I am just wondering why 1/68 kids in the US now have autism, 50 million people in the US now have an auto-immune disease and all of our f&^%ing wildlife is suffering AND NOBODY SEEMS TO KNOW WHY Oh, and read this and get back to me in a month, once you have actually done some of your own research, OK? [image: Doppler Radar] On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:13 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > ChemE, > > You need to research these systems. Each transmitter is far lower than > the powers you list and they are not correlated in time or frequency. > From what I recall the dangers associated with this type of radiation has > never been shown to be significant. > > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 11:17 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio > > David, > > It is not heating. It is the electromagnetic discharge of the > instantaneous pulses of microwave radiation. > > Cell towers are typically 20,000 to 50,000 watts. Read this letter > > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf > > Radiation Impacts and Categorical Exclusions > > "There is a growing level of anecdotal evidence linking effects of > non-thermal, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation from communication > towers on nesting and roosting wild birds and other wildlife in the U.S. > Independent, third-party studies have yet to be conducted in the U.S. or > Canada, > although a peer-reviewed research protocol developed for the U.S. Forest > Service by the Service's Division of Migratory Bird Management is > available to study both collision and radiation impacts (Manville 2002). As > previously mentioned, Balmori (2005) found strong negative correlations > between levels of tower-emitted microwave radiation and bird breeding, > nesting, and roosting in the vicinity of electromagnetic fields in Spain. > He documented nest and site abandonment, plumage deterioration, > locomotion problems, reduced survivorship, and death in House Sparrows, > White Storks, Rock Doves, Magpies, Collared Doves, and other species. > Though these species had historically been documented to roost and nest > in these areas, Balmori (2005) did not observe these symptoms prior to > construction and operation of the cellular phone towers. Balmori and Hallberg > (2007) and Everaert and Bauwens (2007) found similar strong negative > correlations among male House Sparrows. Under laboratory 'conditions, > DiCarlo et al. (2002) raised troubling concerns about impacts of > low-level, non-thermal electromagnetic radiation from the standard 915 > MHz cell phone frequency on domestic chicken embryos- with some lethal > results (Manville 2009). *Given the findings of the studies mentioned > above, field studies should be **conducted in North America to validate > potential impacts of communication tower radiation both direct and indirect > - to migratory birds and other trust wildlife species."* > > > > 50-100 times the normal incidence of "motor-neuron"/ALS around the Guam > radar station > > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/04/guilefulguamguano/ > The motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a group of progressive neurological > disorders that destroy motor neurons, the cells that control essential > voluntary muscle activity such as speaking, walking, breathing, and > swallowing. Normally, messages from nerve cells in the brain (called *upper > motor neurons*) are transmitted to nerve cells in the brain stem and > spinal cord (called *lower motor neurons*) and from them to particular > muscles. Upper motor neurons direct the lower motor neurons to produce > movements such as walking or chewing. Lower motor neurons control movement > in the arms, legs, chest, face, throat, and tongue. Spinal motor neurons > are also called anterior horn cells. Upper motor neurons are also called > corticospinal neurons. > When there are disruptions in the signals between the lowest motor neurons > and the muscle, the muscles do not work properly; the muscles gradually > weaken and may begin wasting away and develop uncontrollable twitching > (called*fasciculations*). When there are disruptions in the signals > between the upper motor neurons and the lower motor neurons, the limb > muscles develop stiffness (called *spasticity*), movements become slow > and effortful, and tendon reflexes such as knee and ankle jerks become > overactive. Over time, the ability to control voluntary movement can be > lost. > > > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:57 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Radar systems detect the target based upon the average power incident >> upon it. This is due to the continuous behavior of noise which tends to >> mask the signal. Heating of the target becomes averaged out during the >> complete period of the base pulse which in this case is about 1 milisecond. >> >> Of course, the reflected wave must be generated by instantaneous currents >> on the target surface as you suggest. If the problem you are analyzing >> occurs during the 1 microsecond time frame then it is quite possible for it >> to be demonstrated. The skin effect also comes into consideration at the >> high RF frequencies which tends to reduce penetration of the signal into >> the target. Better conductivity of the material decreases the dept rapidly. >> >> A true Doppler radar would have the full heating effect due to the RF >> maximum power level as long as the antenna pattern illuminates the target >> you are considering. Also, the pulsed radar pattern of the radar mentioned >> impacts upon your desired target for a small portion of the dish rotation >> time. The average target heating must be adjusted accordingly. >> >> I do not understand the nature of the damage that you are considering >> with your research. If it is associated with the average heating as with a >> microwave oven then the pulse duty cycle, etc. needs to be integrated into >> the equations. My comments earlier were directed toward clarifying the >> difference between a true Doppler radar and a more of less standard pulsed >> system. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 7:17 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >> >> David, the ASR-9 is an airport survellience radar. That is correct >> about the gain, weather/military doppler radar gains are 45-50 dbi, more >> focused dishes. The instantaneous pulses are > 1,000,000 watts but they >> are only on for 1/1000 of each second. Does nature average that high power >> pulse over 1 second like you are doing? And if it does, how does nature do >> that? Does it induce instantaneous electrical currents? Nature operates >> at the speed of light, right? A lot goes on in nature in 1/1000 of a >> second that we don't even see. >> >> >> >> On Sunday, May 11, 2014, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed >>> radar system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar. >>> The duty cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler >>> radar is CW. The average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I >>> assume. The gain of the antenna may be 34 dB relative to an isotropic >>> radiator. >>> >>> Someone might be thinking of a pulsed Doppler radar which measures the >>> change in transmit frequency of the returning pulses to get target velocity >>> information. That type of radar is not a standard Doppler. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Eric Walker <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 9:18 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >>> >>> Stewart, >>> >>> I have glanced at your web site. I have not taken a close look at >>> your research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto >>> something about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free >>> radicals and the death of nearby animal and plant life. You also have a >>> theory of dark matter, and a hunch that dark matter is indirectly >>> responsible for the conclusions concerning doppler radar that you arrive at >>> in your informal research. >>> >>> On the connection to dark matter, I personally have no opinion. I am >>> skeptical, however, that your research is sufficient to establish any kind >>> of linkage between the effects of doppler radar and dark matter, however. >>> In light of this doubt, I think you might be able to get your >>> investigation into doppler radar out to a wider audience if you did not >>> combine it with the question of dark matter. Adding dark matter into the >>> mix asks too much of people in their suspension of disbelief for them to be >>> able to give much credibility to your doppler radar hunch, even if both >>> hunches ended up being true. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:55 PM, ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Radar/Call SignMHTModel ASR-9Max Pulsed Power (Watts)1,300,000Gain >>>> (dBi)34Frequency (MHz)2,800RPM12.5Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km >>>> 10.39Pulse Duration(uSec)1.00Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)1,000Range Est. >>>> (Miles)60Latitude42.937248 Longitude-71.437286FIPS33011County >>>> HillsboroughStateNH >>>> >>> >>> >
