From: Jed Rothwell
The paper by Luca Gamberale of Defkalion Europe (DE) described the problems in detail. It is pretty damning: http://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/dgt-faulty-demo-140502-english.pdf In the law of the USA and most countries, the most convincing evidence of all in a court proceeding – even if it is secondhand or hearsay – is called “declaration (admission) against interest”. Gamberale’s statements can be easily construed as declarations against interest, since as an agent of DGT he would be arguably better off financially if he never made those statements. They are highly believable, whereas everything DGT says to the contrary is tainted by financial gain. DGT would be naked in any legal proceeding. The secondary implication of this is that Rossi, even with a grossly deficient patent, would surely prevail against DGT in court, at least in the USA. Jones
