He paid the price, and the report may not be the end of the procedure, but
the beginning.

the only good news is that DGT admit they only have 5 clients and no money
transferred. Sure that those clients (if real) will check the calorimetry
twice, or run.

The question is if Defkalion have nothing, a low performance reactor, or
something real, and why they tried to fool Luca Gamberale in a so stupid
way.

I know that they are or pretend to be paranoid about industrial spying,
that their governance is complex (Stremmenos said they were megalomaniac...
maybe too general), but this looks so stupid even for a scam.

They business model (big money upfront) is judged irrational by a
specialist I've contacted. It can change.

I can only hope that they have a real technology, and that either they
demonstrate it seriously (not an option now), or that they are dismantled
and a serious company develop it rationally.



Now we should read the only evidence that remain, the report of Nelson.
The attention Nelson put in avoiding water boiling is retrospectively very
important. This may explain why the COP was low, not because of temperature
but because the tricks did not work well or at all.
Have to re-read the report, but it was not detailed enough.

As expected since few month, it will be used by skeptics to fool the masses
agains Ciold Fusion, pushing everybody to deny E-cat test, whatever are the
results and the protocols.
Whatever technology they own or not, they hurt LENR development.



2014-05-13 4:34 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>:

> Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>  If Gamberale is not operating in the role of an exclusive agent for
>> either party, that does not negate a joint agency… complicating matters. If
>> his financial interests would align with DGT in any significant way, he can
>> be construed as an agent. . . .
>>
>
> Well, his interests did align, that's for sure.
>
> What you say makes sense. I do not know enough about the law to judge the
> particulars.
>
> Gamberale has guts. He is clearly a man of integrity.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to