This might very well be the case. They needed time enough for the technology to be reliably demonstrated under critical eyes. So they wait for the 3rd party test report, then announce that they will demo to the patent office per USPTO's stated position. This will create buzz, just like what happened when the Wright brothers demo'd their devices to crowds that were highly skeptical (at first), and it became a huge media event.
2014-05-11 18:43 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook <[email protected]>: > <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> > > Rossi's partners at Industrial Heat (IH) are probably familiar with the > patent system and are stringing out the issuance as long as possible. > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Rossi's partners at Industrial Heat (IH) are probably familiar with the > patent system and are stringing out the issuance as long as possible. Like > Dave said, this allows patent protection into the future as long as > possible. > > Rossi did say recently on his blog that he does not understand the theory > of his invention. At least this was what was implied. As is evident, > peer review of any theory is problematic at this time. > > However, it seems that the PO will issue patents without a proven theory > to explain every detail of an inventions operation. The Navy and NASA have > gotten cold fusion patents for inventions and the theory is not evident > yet. In addition the Japanese are also giving patents and EU is as well. > I think the PO decided that it needed to get into the field for fear of > being being a pimble on the A of progress here in the US. > > Rossi has several months to answer the PO's comments regarding his > application. I assume IH will do that to best of their ability, consistent > with their strategy. I would guess this strategy attempts to take into > account whether any other entity understands how to build a working E-Cat > or Hot Cat and, if not, an estimate when someone might catch on. > > It will be interesting to observe whether or not the independent third > party, testing the Rossi invention, comes out with any theory about how it > works. It may be that the third party agreed not to discuss theory and > only report results of the testing. > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2014 2:13 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June-- > > Rossi has already done that. He reported that last year his coworkers > were able to build one of his devices and get excess heat simply on his > instructions, without him being in the room (or even being on the same > continent). > > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Rossi needs to explain how to build the thing or he's not getting a >> patent. >> >> >> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> When this report is published it will probably be greeted with a yawn. >>> Rossi needs to demo his plant to the patent office and then he'd get his >>> patent approved. It would be at that point that LENR breaks out. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Yesterday Rossi (on his reader blog) indicated that the third party >>>> tests would *not* be reported before June. >>>> >>>> Vortexers have at least another month to speculate on the mechanism of >>>> the Ni-H Rossi Effect. However it may be quite bit longer, depending upon >>>> patent disclosure strategy. What are the possibilities regarding outing of >>>> a theory supported by good data in conjunction with the release of the >>>> third party report? >>>> >>>> Like Rossi implies in his response to a comment yesterday regarding the >>>> probability of the Rossi Effect happening naturally, the design of his >>>> reactor certainly had some design behind it. I think Focardi nailed the >>>> theory and should be hailed appropriately. Rossi had the wherewithal to >>>> add some development funds and theory of his own and probably should get >>>> the Nobel Prize. I hope it happens soon. >>>> >>>> I am planning a trip to Italy in September and will visit the >>>> University of Bologna for two days with the objective of talking with folks >>>> who knew Focardi and are currently working in the field of solid states >>>> physics and nano technology. Alain has already asked me to visit the >>>> History Dept there as well to find out the facts about the death of Bruno >>>> which this blog discussed a few weeks ago. >>>> >>>> I will report on my trip and interactions. Vortexers that may have >>>> other ideas or questions, if so inclined, should present them to me via my >>>> own email address so that I might address them with the Bologna historians >>>> or researchers. Alain has already given me some good ideas and leads. >>>> >>>> Bob Cook >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 02, 2014 9:38 AM >>>> *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Pasadena: Theater Arts at Caltech >>>> dramatizes the discovery and debunking of “cold fusion” (bring tomatoes) >>>> >>>> I believe that play has been around for a while. I heard about it years >>>> ago. >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
