Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wish you'd believe me he did not get the result in that way. :) > Ask him. If Kim tells me he observed experiments himself, I will believe it. I will still consider him naive. Even if he observed experiments, he could not have checked the flow rate. He would have seen the device was not producing excess heat. As far as I know, no one has every confirmed that it produces excess heat, and all of the measurements of excess heat have been mistaken. Perhaps there are measurements I did not hear about. If the people at Defkalion have a legitimate, third party report showing excess heat, they should publish it. They are in deep trouble. They may even end up facing criminal charges for fraud. I presume a third party report would exonerate them. So they should publish one if they have it. Whatever business reasons they might have for secrecy, staying out the courtroom and staying out of jail should be a higher priority. I think it is unlikely any report exists. I also think it is unlikely the device ever worked. I cannot tell whether this was fraud or incompetence. The only way to find out would be to conduct an investigation with a warrant to bring them in for questioning and search their e-mail and other sources for evidence that they knew the flow rate was wrong, and they deliberately set the valves to make it wrong. That is what Gamberale alleges here: http://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/ Gamberale said, "To obtain this effect it’s necessary to operate two valves in a certain way, so you need to have the intention to do it." - Jed
