Axil, that's not how the legal system works.  There are no "cold fusion
laws".


On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just one legal case dealing will cold fusion please, just one.
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Axil, if you lie to someone that something does something it doesn't work
>> so they give you money, that's Fraud.
>>
>> You can use a dictionary, if you like.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> To support your opinion, please provide legal precedent pursuant to pink
>>> unicorn fairy dust or cold fusion: just one please.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The subject matter is meaningless.  The subject could be pink unicorn
>>>> fairy dust.
>>>>
>>>> What matters if money changed hands over misrepresentation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> At this juncture, cold fusion is not a subject where the words "
>>>>> criminal statute", fraud, NDA, jail, and "illegal actions" apply. When a
>>>>> valid patent is granted and the field of cold fusion becomes generally
>>>>> accepted in the real world, then DGT might well fell it legally possible 
>>>>> to
>>>>> bring  Gamberale to account.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Interesting point, Jed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if this is why DGT is reluctant to sue him, because Luca
>>>>>> would have to prove himself by saying that DGT was fraudulent and they
>>>>>> don't want to have to defend against that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Jed Rothwell 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The problem with busting your NDA so openly is that it's going to
>>>>>>>> be impossible to get anyone to trust you again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As I pointed out elsewhere, if Gamberale had not "busted his NDA
>>>>>>> openly," warned the customers, and closed down the company, he could 
>>>>>>> end up
>>>>>>> in jail. Defkalion cannot enforce an NDA that calls for the person under
>>>>>>> that NDA to commit fraud. You cannot abide by an NDA contract that calls
>>>>>>> for illegal actions. Defkalion cannot enforce that, or sue for breach of
>>>>>>> contract. You cannot sue someone in civil court because they refused to
>>>>>>> violate a criminal statute.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It may be difficult for Gamberale to get anyone to trust him now,
>>>>>>> but if he had continued it would have impossible for him to get the 
>>>>>>> police
>>>>>>> to believe him, which is a far worse predicament.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is real life. You cannot go around trying to sell non-working
>>>>>>> machines for millions of dollars. People who have millions of dollars 
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> definitely go to the authorities when they find out you have robbed 
>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>> This is not like selling fake Rolex watches from a suitcase on Broadway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to