Why should I? I've simply noticed that you and Daniel Rocha have gone over the edge in the last few days. If you were in a real quest for a more perfect truth, you'd be re-examining the messages you've posted at Jed over the last few days.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > In the quest for a more perfect truth, please identify who DGT has > defrauded and of what? > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> The issue isn't whether Gamberale was defrauded. It is whether or not >> Defkalion engaged in fraud. >> >> And that issue is probably moot anyways, because the only real thing >> someone could hope for is some cash in their pocket from a civil lawsuit. >> That isn't gonna happen because Defkalion is broke. >> >> >> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Defrauding people or organizations of money or valuables is the usual >>> purpose of fraud. How was Gamberale defrauded? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> The legal system DOES rely on precedent. And there's tons of it when >>>> it comes to fraud. Is cold fusion supposed to be somehow exempt? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I thought that the legal system worked on precedent. That is how the >>>>> legal system provides consistency. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Axil, that's not how the legal system works. There are no "cold >>>>>> fusion laws". >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Just one legal case dealing will cold fusion please, just one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Axil, if you lie to someone that something does something it >>>>>>>> doesn't work so they give you money, that's Fraud. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You can use a dictionary, if you like. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To support your opinion, please provide legal precedent pursuant >>>>>>>>> to pink unicorn fairy dust or cold fusion: just one please. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The subject matter is meaningless. The subject could be pink >>>>>>>>>> unicorn fairy dust. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What matters if money changed hands over misrepresentation. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Axil Axil >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At this juncture, cold fusion is not a subject where the words " >>>>>>>>>>> criminal statute", fraud, NDA, jail, and "illegal actions" apply. >>>>>>>>>>> When a >>>>>>>>>>> valid patent is granted and the field of cold fusion becomes >>>>>>>>>>> generally >>>>>>>>>>> accepted in the real world, then DGT might well fell it legally >>>>>>>>>>> possible to >>>>>>>>>>> bring Gamberale to account. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting point, Jed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if this is why DGT is reluctant to sue him, because >>>>>>>>>>>> Luca would have to prove himself by saying that DGT was fraudulent >>>>>>>>>>>> and they >>>>>>>>>>>> don't want to have to defend against that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Jed Rothwell < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem with busting your NDA so openly is that it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going to be impossible to get anyone to trust you again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As I pointed out elsewhere, if Gamberale had not "busted his >>>>>>>>>>>>> NDA openly," warned the customers, and closed down the company, >>>>>>>>>>>>> he could >>>>>>>>>>>>> end up in jail. Defkalion cannot enforce an NDA that calls for >>>>>>>>>>>>> the person >>>>>>>>>>>>> under that NDA to commit fraud. You cannot abide by an NDA >>>>>>>>>>>>> contract that >>>>>>>>>>>>> calls for illegal actions. Defkalion cannot enforce that, or sue >>>>>>>>>>>>> for breach >>>>>>>>>>>>> of contract. You cannot sue someone in civil court because they >>>>>>>>>>>>> refused to >>>>>>>>>>>>> violate a criminal statute. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It may be difficult for Gamberale to get anyone to trust him >>>>>>>>>>>>> now, but if he had continued it would have impossible for him to >>>>>>>>>>>>> get the >>>>>>>>>>>>> police to believe him, which is a far worse predicament. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is real life. You cannot go around trying to sell >>>>>>>>>>>>> non-working machines for millions of dollars. People who have >>>>>>>>>>>>> millions of >>>>>>>>>>>>> dollars will definitely go to the authorities when they find out >>>>>>>>>>>>> you have >>>>>>>>>>>>> robbed them. This is not like selling fake Rolex watches from a >>>>>>>>>>>>> suitcase on >>>>>>>>>>>>> Broadway. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
